|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Should FIRST adopt this as the new rules? | |||
| Yes, This is much better |
|
13 | 30.95% |
| No, Both this and FIRST are way off |
|
14 | 33.33% |
No, I for 1 like negative points
|
|
15 | 35.71% |
| Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Update: read my post at the bottom for more info, im out!
Now, I doubt that negative scores will happen, but this scoring system is getting rediculously complex. Can't it be simpler and easyer to understand? My sugestion - very easy The number of boxes in the stack* with the most boxes in it is multiplied by the TOTAL number of boxes in the scoring zone. PERIOD, NO MATER WHAT! *Definition of stack dictionary.com "An orderly pile, especially one arranged in layers." Legalese "A group of boxes supported by 1 and only 1 box, or any non-box item. Each box can only directly support 1other box. Any stack not fitting this description is not elegible for the high stack.THATS IT; The boxes in it are just regular boxes!!! High points (pun intended ) in this plan
ps. this exact same message will be posted in all negative point threads, and in its own poll thread in the rules forum. any updates/replies should be posted in poll thread, so please make sticky. goto the poll thread and lets make it a petitition!!!! pps. sorry bout the speling, gammer, too many !'s and bouts of RAGE; its 3:45AM!! -Matt Stearn CUL8R edit: minor cleanup edit: spelling edit: added SHU comment edit: I made an error in my calculation that made everything before my idea void. So, i deleted it and replaced it. Also, toned down some rhetoric, and removed referances to neagative points. i spent 10 minutes checking those things, think how hard it will be to do it on the fly durring the game! edit: minor rewording, but nothing changed edit: capitilization, spelling, punctuaion Last edited by redbeard0531 : 12-01-2003 at 18:55. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Uniform rules and enforcers? | Ben Mitchell | General Forum | 31 | 12-01-2005 20:55 |
| Dilemma - Letter of the rules v. spirit of the rules | Natchez | General Forum | 27 | 03-04-2003 15:37 |
| What rules would you change? | tonyargote | Rules/Strategy | 3 | 05-02-2003 18:56 |
| Time for new rules! | archiver | 2001 | 11 | 24-06-2002 02:01 |
| Why change the rules? | archiver | 1999 | 9 | 23-06-2002 22:15 |