|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I know atleast 20% of the all the FIRST robotics team websites use frames, and they make editing, adding, deleting, etc... stuff easy. But there are major side effects to using them.
1. They are not browser friendly. Mozilla, Netscape, and possibly others (like CompuServe for sure) don't handle them easily. (Thanks to Gadget for announcing the "they are not browser friendly" comment) 2. A big mess. Take team 5's site for an example. Before I had the menu that's on it now, the frames destroyed the other menu basically. Sure, it was a drop-down, but the code for it was basically useless. If you want a nice, clean site, use non-frames (or atleast have an option for the user wanting to view a frames or non-frames site). My poetry site is made without frames, and easy to browse (it should be anyways, it's only 4 pages). Yes, frames can make your site load faster (depending on where your server is, and a few other things), but sooner or later, it'll slow down your site to a hault. 3. Annoying. If you think a next door neighbor with his music blaring at 2 am while you are trying to sleep is annoying, try this. Frames can make images seem distorted, text become wrapped (which is bad sometimes). Even if a high-class website designer did a site in frames, it would still look the same as if a 5-year old internet newbie did one. 4. Take over the screen for small computers [Credit to Joseph M] More to be added soon, as soon as I can think of more reasons. [Note: All facts are not proven, but most are reliable to be true. These are my opinions. Flame if you want] Last edited by Raven_Writer : 24-02-2003 at 14:31. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Amen brother....
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
"Do you use frames?" |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
ya, a poll, i tried frames once, and only once....
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I'm going to see if I can change our web site so we don't have to have frames.
But here are more reasons to not have frames: -Take over the screen for small computers -Mess up pictures |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is one use for frames, if you own a site like www.something.com , but it's hosted on lycos, you can turn the page on something.com to a big frame that points to the lyccos one.
still, multiple ones just don't work well. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
The 2nd webpage I ever made was frames.
Now I use nothing but tables: http://replic.ricified.net See? They're sooooo much better. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah you really do not need to use tables once you upgrade to css. You can move text and pictures anywhere you need to without a table.
![]() |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| # of frames | Adam D | 3D Animation and Competition | 8 | 16-03-2002 22:45 |
| 10 Reasons Why FIRST sucks. | Anton Abaya | General Forum | 20 | 11-12-2001 14:32 |