|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
368'z 2 cents
well..368 did flip a few robots..
and damage a couple it was not intentional, and as they said before, it is part of the game i think that the silicon valley regional had a lot of gracious professionalism compared to other regionals there was no agreements, and we all had fun <-main point in first rite?? i did however witness a beginning of a fight, between two teams..who shall remain nameless... the team that got flipped was extremely mad, and confronted another team. the confrontation was brief, and was only verbal, but it did happen and i hope it wont happen again. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Non - GP-ism at SVR
Quote:
In my opinion, most teams think strategy is optional this year, and the key to winning is their bot. IMO, that is waaaay wrong. It is optional in the way that it is not nearly as necessary as it was in 2001, but it is an essential part of the game this year, if you wanted to win. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Non - GP-ism at SVR
Quote:
I think FIRST is being "geared down" to rookies, and the average person - as a result, it's losing a lot of the inventiveness and professionalism that made it great. The emphasis is now definitely on "Gracious" and not "Professionalism." This was all predicted in 2001: "The End of Elegance" in FIRST I think FIRST has hit or is beginning to hit its apogee, and will slowly burn itself down to a managable level. FIRST doesn't need to recruit more teams. FIRST needs to keep teams around for 2+ years, and let teams become more experianced. I'd rather see 30 good teams with innovative robots at a regional, than 60 teams that are clueless. I also have an inclination to believe that some of the people in the upper echelons of FIRST might have lost sight of what this program was about. It's not about including everyone: inclusion will be the death of this program. It's about setting us apart in a good way. Last edited by Ben Mitchell : 27-04-2003 at 12:49. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mayb the robot that was tipped was a serious threat to the opposing teams, and they *knew* they couldnt beat it, so they did what was wrong and tipped it. Thats one way of controlling a game. I disagree with it, and would rather have seen the match been played out by all four robots. Ohh well...
In the last 30 seconds of one of our matches, both of our robots were on the ramp, one of theirs, and a ton of bins on our side of the field. Their other alliance robot was stuck - high centered on a bin. So i went and unstuck them, and then they headed for the ramp. They get up there and wouldnt let us up. I pushed and shooved until all robots ended on the ramp. You shoulda heard the gasp from the audience when i drove our robot off the ramp. Most things that happen in a match are for stratagy, you dont go tipping other robots just to prove you can. I tipped a robot once. They were able to get up, and I'll tell you, they showen no mercy after that.! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thanks to 115 & 852 SVR Champions | Dennis Jenks | Thanks and/or Congrats | 3 | 09-04-2003 00:12 |
| Svr... | Wetzel | Regional Competitions | 77 | 08-04-2003 13:01 |
| No Collusion at SVR | Patrick Wang | Regional Competitions | 14 | 31-03-2003 23:57 |
| Internet Connection at SVR? | mrobrien | Regional Competitions | 0 | 25-03-2003 15:01 |
| Team Social at SVR? | AlbertW | Regional Competitions | 0 | 12-03-2003 01:47 |