|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Should Weigh in be With or Without Battery | |||
| With |
|
31 | 55.36% |
| Without |
|
19 | 33.93% |
| Weight Limit should be increased to make things more exciting. |
|
6 | 10.71% |
| Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
By what you're saying, it seems there are teams out there using cardboard batteries during weigh in.
I don't think a team would get to the point to use a dummy battery, in the sense of a hollow one or something like that. What I have read here in the forums is that some teams use really old batteries for inspection, as it is a known fact that they actually get lighter with time. It is a cheap shot, nonetheless, but you can always blame it on the freshman member for putting it in place, in case you get caught. So, yes, I think the robot should be weighted without the battery in place, or at least some "official" one, standardized to every team. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Oh, and don't try to place your toe under the scale and lift up while your robot is being weighed. They look for that too. (although it is helpful and okay to fudge with it a little up and down before the acutal reading is taken to ensure an accurate measurement.) |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Last year we were weighting the robot in Seattle and the scale would range from 130 to 130.5, so *someone* (was it me? ) had the brilliant idea to empty the air tanks to see if it would help - heck, the air above us weights a whole lot .Well, the scale actually went half a pound up... Go figure "And the robot got some nice speed holes..." |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I must admit...
If we were close at weigh in, we would weigh all of our available current year batteries and choose the lightest one. This helped us a little and also fell well within the spirit of GP and FIRST.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
For example, if the official battery is deemed to weigh 14 pounds, just make the weight limit 116 pounds, and have everyone weigh in w/o the battery. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
In that regard, the scales at the Championship seemed to vary by up to 1/2 pound anyway, so there's already a lot of "slop" in the whole weigh-in process. I don't have a problem with people weighing in with the lightest battery they have (as long as it's still a legal battery). There's no rule against it and it only gains them a marginal amount of weight anyway. If there really are teams that would stoop so low as to weigh in with a hollowed out battery, then those teams will find a way to cheat one way or another, making this somewhat of a moot point. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think we should weigh in without the battery and change the weight limit to 55 kg.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Batteries
I would say without or at least FIRST should have a 'Standard' battery weight. We used 8 batteries last year and the difference between the lightest and heaviest was almost 1 lb.
DET Team 343 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: I must admit...
Quote:
I have seen a ~2lb difference (12.2lb - 14lb) between some batteries. 2lb's is a lot of speed holes if you don't have the "right" battery to weigh in with. My suggestion: Rule: Battery must be easily removed in under 15 seconds. Reasons: 1) Very few designs have broken that 2) Easy for battery removal weigh in after Systems check. Team shows up, does all the tests (lights, air, etc.), then gets timed for battery removal, then weighs in without putting the battery back in. This alleviates the 'dummy battery' problem, battery weight flux problem, and gives grounds for "changing" weight limit. Be it, "lower" to 120lbs [no bat] or "keep" at 130. (Keep in mind 12-14lbs + for battery when on field) |
|
#11
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
battery
The weight of exact same year, same model batteries will vary from 13.5 to 14.2.
I have heard of some rookie teams that weigh in with a "Dead" battery to save weight. That is what the veteran teams tell them to do. ![]() |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
If any of you remember when we moved from the drill batteries to the current batteries the weight limit was increased 10lbs to be able to keep the weight limit the same. So there is no real reason to change the weight limit or weigh in without a battery.
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Batteries
Quote:
P.S. If you get to weigh in without the battery, people will just add 10 lbs more stuff on their robots, and the point is defeated. Cory |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Batteries
Quote:
130lbs = 130lbs with battery. 130lbs with battery = 116-117 lbs of materals + 13-14 lbs battery. Has your team ever had to make speed holes to cut a 1/2 lb? Why do that when you can grab a different battery and problem is solved? That's what many teams do. Weigh in with a lighter battery, inspect at 130lbs, then go in to the field at 131 lbs. 1lb can make the difference between an assembly working and not working. I say.. make it fair for all. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Batteries
Quote:
I guess I didn't really understand "what all the fuss was about" until you phrased it like this. I wonder if FIRST has ever considered this? It seems like a trivial issue, but there is a definite something to it. John |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| running bot off car battery? | Trashed20 | Electrical | 25 | 06-06-2003 12:57 |
| Quick release battery connector and 120 amps | n[ate]vw | Electrical | 6 | 18-01-2003 23:41 |
| Off-topic battery stuff. | FotoPlasma | Electrical | 4 | 06-01-2003 12:19 |
| connecting to the battery | ahecht | Technical Discussion | 1 | 25-01-2002 17:15 |