|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Amount of contact this year
I think in autonomous while people are going after the bonus balls you will see some of the more interesting hits....
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Amount of contact this year
Quote:
But getting 5+ feet off the floor will make you immune to smashing by many teams, making it a very good strategy. If you're 6" off the ground, you're going to take a real pounding. Cory |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Amount of contact this year
This year we have those important large balls and all the small balls running around. Since these are very important I expect to see a lot of teams manipulating them. In 2001 you didn't have to worry about designing a grabber that would withstand high impacts and lots of pulling. This year should be a different story. I can see teams coming up with super strong grabbers or other means of holding the ball firmly and/or stealing it. I can also see these grabbers getting twisted into pretzels. I think this year is much more like 2000 in terms of contact because 2002/3 didn't require the same kind of extra mechanisms to accomlish the tasks while still being able to take a bit of a beating.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Amount of contact this year
hold on, ARE we allowed to try to take the big balls from say, a robot who has a grip on the ball. like tearing it from their grip?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| Motors Same year to year? | Rkelly6280 | Motors | 1 | 16-12-2003 08:53 |
| Championship Qualification - How you would've done it | Ken Leung | Championship Event | 6 | 26-10-2003 14:00 |
| Wow! what a year | archiver | 2000 | 8 | 23-06-2002 22:43 |
| Making heads or tails of the new announcement... | Jessica Boucher | General Forum | 66 | 26-09-2001 11:13 |