|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Ruling in Robot Tipping | |||
| Team A is DQed due to malicious intent. |
|
4 | 6.06% |
| Team B is out of luck due to a coincidental collision. |
|
32 | 48.48% |
| Would have needed to see to make a judgement call. |
|
30 | 45.45% |
| Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
This was brought up in a pre- regional scrimmage that was held in our area, and we were wondering if we could get everyone's oppinion on this issue:
Team A's robot has a rather "useful" arm that can be used in a variaty of ways. While driving for a goal Team A happens to collide with Team B, an opposing team. Team B, because of thier height collides directly into Team A's arm and subsequently proceeds to topple over, ending up in a useless pile of rubble sprawled out on the playing field. Now, here is the question, what ruling do the judges make in such a situation? It was clearly not a malicious act, but Team B was flipped over nonetheless. Any thoughts? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How much planning goes into your robot? | Jnadke | General Forum | 41 | 29-01-2006 21:29 |
| serious problem found - robot controller resets when jarred! | KenWittlief | Electrical | 23 | 19-03-2003 13:30 |
| WASH Palm scouting at the Championship | Mike Soukup | Scouting | 2 | 19-04-2002 15:14 |
| Index of team's post about their robot... | Ken Leung | Robot Showcase | 1 | 20-03-2002 17:10 |
| about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 12 | 26-11-2001 09:39 |