|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
This year one of our mentors was an engineer for DEKA, the research firm that Dean Kamen runs (responsable for such things as the Segway and IBot). Our team is a rookie tema and one of our biggest hurdles we had to overcome was maling things.. we basically made our robot with a hacksaw and a drill press..
So during the competition we needed to drill a hole through some hardened steel. Needless to say the machine shop at the competition wasn't up to it (they broke a few bits trying). So our mentor and I drove over to DEKA (a few blocks away from the NH regional) and used their shop. It is massive and has millions of dollars of machinery... its undescribable the feeling seeing this place... But it raises the question was he right to hold this resource away from our team. He was worried that since DEKA has such a connection with FIRST it would be wrong to sponsor a team. I'm just curios about what other people think about this. I totally understand where he is coming from, but even if our team had been given one day a week in that place we could have done so much. P.S. - our team did great at the NH regional... we placed 14/51 and got all the way to the quarters... partially due to the transmissions the guys at DEKA were able to fix... I rephrased my question down below Last edited by _GP_ : 07-03-2004 at 22:45. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: An ethical question
Quote:
Quote:
Sheesh. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An ethical question
The way I see it it's a tough question and different people are going to have different points of view. The way I see it is that some of the teams do better at constucting a robot than others because of the facilities available to them. The fact is a lot of times it depends who's involved with your team and who your sponsors are. Some teams don't have the resources to do certain machining and such and allow the sponsors to do it. I personally don't see an issue with this as long as the students are still able to learn. It just so happened that one of your mentors was involved with DEKA, and if they helped you out during the six weeks so be it, other teams had major corporations backing them too. So far I don't see any issues. Now here's where I don't agree with what you did, having facilities and an advantage available to you at a competition that other teams didn't. Other teams had to wait and possibly miss matches because something broke and they had to wait to get it fixed while you didn't have to worry about that. Personally it just seems that having that advantage at the competition is different than during the six weeks.
That's my two cents, feel free to agree or disagree. [EDIT] I didn't realize M Krass posted before me and checking she is right...it is against the rules at competition.[EDIT] Last edited by Jay H 237 : 07-03-2004 at 21:19. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An ethical question
As far as DEKA not sponsoring a team, I think DEKA would understand all too well what FIRST is about and help too much. We had too few tools and too little adult support. The only thing we had was the money, and even that, we had enough not to have to worry about it, but not enough to, say, make a second bot. Part of the point of FIRST is to work your [booty] off. You need to struggle for sponsarship, struggle to get engineers to help you, struggle to find a good mentor, struggle to get team members that are actual help, struggle to learn what all the kit parts can do, struggle to learn what non-kit parts and tools can do, struggle to learn this years game, struggle to design something that should work, struggle to make the thing you designed, struggle to debug said creation, and struggle to fight such things as the time limit, plummeting grades at school, and failing relationships with non-FIRST friends and relatives.
FIRST is about struggleing with everything, and refusing to backdown. It's about fighting every step of the way, and succeeding. Without this struggle, what would be the point? Without this struggle, I wouldn't be NEARLY as proud of myself, and my team, as I am right now. FIRST is a struggle because it's supposed to be the greatest thing you will do in high school. For me, it was exactly that. It's the first thing I've actually worked hard at in my entire life. That's why DEKA doesn't sponsor a team. They could remove almost all struggle. Then what would that high school team get out of FIRST? Not too much, in my opinion. Last edited by Amanda Morrison : 07-03-2004 at 21:42. Reason: censored words |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: An ethical question
Forget the fact that is was DEKA - is it against the rules or the spirit of FIRST that you went off-site to get the work done during a Regional? I won't attampt to answer that question - per an earlier post it sounds like it is. Maybe a better solution would have been to go out and buy or borrow a bit tough enough to do the work and then ave it done at the regional site b the on-site crew.
Regarding 'holding back on the facility' - Rolls-Royce and General Motors / Allison are two of our major sponsors. Rolls-Royce makes gas turbine engines and could machine any of our parts, but they do not. We have never even asked. Same holds true for Allison - they make truck and tank transmissions and I am sure could make beautiful parts for us - but again, we have never even asked. The team makes do with what tools and capabilities we have. When we have a part that we cannot make we go pay to have it made. Remember too that you are talking about very expensive machines and machine tools. DEKA (or any other sponsor) could not let you work in their shop - for your protection, their protection and the risk to their equipment. Like said above, be thankful for what your volunteer brought to you - and I certainly hope your post has not gotten him in trouble..... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An ethical question
First off I want to appologize. Neither our mentor nor anyone on the team understood that it was illegal for us to do what we did. We had already lost 2 matches because we had sat there immobile because our drive train was broken. We were desperate for a fix, especially after the machine shop could not help us. All it was was drilling holes through the rod (lacking proper term) that comes our of the transmission. I'm sure if we had known we were breaking a rule we would have found a way to do this without going off site.
Our team is grateful for everything we got this season, and we fought for it all. Last spring I founded the team, and for the most part it has been run by students. The students raised all the money (we ran on a total budget of $7,000), we found all the engineers, and aranged for the facility and tools. We live in a small town were there are literally no companies so finding sponsorship was hard. We especially had a tough time finding mentors. We went to the extent of looking in the town directory and calling people whos perfessions we listed as "engineering". Still the majority of our mentors were parents of team members. We are extremely grateful to everyone of them for all they gave to us. Finally I want to rephrase my question. What I really want to know is if people think its right for a company associated so closely with FIRST to support a team. Also I'm not suggesting they make parts for us, but allow our team to use their shop. It would seem to me that this would give our students a closer experience to what actual engineers have. I'm not in any way disagreeing with our mentors desision. Last edited by _GP_ : 07-03-2004 at 22:51. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An ethical question
To put this in perspective, you dont need special equipment to drill hardened steel - you only need special drill bits
I speculate that your mentor knew they had those bits at DEKA, and probabally is not allowed to remove them from the building, or if he did, would have to bring them right back, therefore making two trips so taking the part with him and drilling it at DEKA only saved him a trip - its not like he used a plasma cutter to fashion news parts for you - it was only a drill press as for your other concern, DEKA is an acronym for DEan KAmen - its literally his company, and since he is the founder of FIRST, it would be a conflict of interest for him to sponsor his own team - Im sure Dean is closely aware of the new games each year, rules, ideas for how the new game will be played... how would it look if he sponsored a team and it won a regional, or the championship, or won the chairmans awards people would think it was all fishy and smelled accordingly Since Dean started this whole program 13 years ago, and has managed to donate enough time and life-energy to make FIRST an independant self-sustaining entity, I dont think he also needs to sponsor individual teams. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An ethical question
Quote:
And to make a counter point, Dave Lavery is deeply involved in the making of this years game, and he still participates on a team (I believe) |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: An ethical question
Quote:
I do not believe that the sponsorship of DEKA represents any conflict of interest, just as I do not believe Dave Lavery's assistance to team 116 is a cause for concern. Similarly, Nypro gives no advantage to the team it sponsors. The interest, you'll recall, is not winning. The interest is inspiration. So, if by seeing DEKA's manufacturing and research facilities, your students are inspired to go farther and do more, FIRST is doing its job. I have no doubt that there are teams with machine shop capabilities that can easily rival those available at DEKA. Those capabilities, while rare, are not unique. I trust most of the people involved in FIRST enough to respect the importance of keeping some things quiet. They seem to understand, above all else, that their behavior and attitude affect students' perceptions of engineering just as much as their mechanical aptitude and machining skills. Integrity is as much an asset as a CNC mill. ...as far as going to DEKA to have your parts drilled -- I don't think there's anyone, myself included, who'd begrudge you for that or deny you an opportunity to play the game. I was simply pointing out that it is against the rules. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An ethical question
Quote:
Dave works for Nasa or JPL - he doenst OWN JPL. another way to look at this is that Dean has founded this program, so in a sense he sponsored all the teams at a different level, making the FIRST organization possible, without which there would be no teams at all. Last edited by KenWittlief : 08-03-2004 at 07:57. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: An ethical question
The Nu-trons, a 7th year veteran team finished 49th out of 51 with at least 75% of rookies doing better than us. We had no downtime, every single minute the robot was in the pits we were repairing design problems. To illustrate how bad it was: I'm one of the programmers, I had to implement new feature in the software. I had less than 10 minutes to do this between matches.
Here's my major issue: it was against the rules to take parts off site. We would have killed to take some parts back to our lab in Boston and work on them so we wouldn't have the problems we did. The other issue would be at what time you did this. Since, the machine shop closed early. The machine shop at BAE could do almost anything, they even let us borrow drill bits. The guys did a lot of work for us and for that we are extremely grateful. However, the schedule claimed the machine shop was open to 5pm Saturday. At 3pm, they told us they were closing shop. They said, "Come un are you going to give us crap? We worked all day for you. Some competition sites don't even have a machine shop." With the new rule stating you can't build parts after a competition, everything has to be done on site, we were extremely dissapointed. Needless to say, not everything got fixed. I hope Annapolis has a machine shop ![]() |
|
#12
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: An ethical question
I would have no problem with even Dean Himself leading a team.
In fact, I have often felt that if Dean and Woodie were forced to actually lead a FIRST team, FIRST would be very different. As to ethics, of course it would be a difficult spot for them to be in, but I think that we could all deal with it. FIRST is never going to be "fair." In my view, we should give up fairness as even a goal. "Fair enough" is the only thing we can hope for. Deka sponsorship of a FIRST team is fair enough for me. Joe J. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: An ethical question
A tight spot to be in for DEKA, yes, but I tend to agree with Al and Joe on this issue. It wouldn't bother me if DEKA sponsored a team at all. FIRST always needs more sponsors and a sponsor that already understands FIRST is a great one.
It does appear that there is an infraction of the stated rules, but it doesn't appear to violate the spirit of the rule in my humble opinion. Had this rookie team fully known that one rule (out of the whole manual and 14 updates) I'm sure they might have found a way to get the drill bit to the competition. In the end, there seems to be no unfair advantage created. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An ethical question
The team going out to get the hole drilled does not bother me in the least. I know what the rules say but i would rather them do that then not play because there robot did not have a hole.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dean's corporation has little link to FIRST other than the fact that Dean rules both.
The question you have to ask is: Are you recieving more help than any other team would ethically be allowed to? It sounds like not. There are teams sponsored by auto companies, and aircraft companies. Nobody looke down upon them, so I doubt anybody will look down on you. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MIM's question of the day on programming. | Gene F | Programming | 3 | 24-02-2004 16:32 |
| A question about control system options | computhief263 | Control System | 7 | 04-02-2004 14:46 |
| my idea of a question forum... | Ken Leung | General Forum | 12 | 30-11-2002 12:17 |
| MnM EASY Question of the Day Winners! | Mike Bonham | General Forum | 22 | 03-05-2002 21:21 |
| Chief Delphi Site Question | Mike Bonham | General Forum | 1 | 16-02-2002 22:18 |