|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Goal Lifting!?!?!?!
If a team lifts a goal completely off of the ground and your robot is designed to interact with the bottom platform of the goal and now it is above your robt frame does this DQ you or the robot that lifted the goals? Or something along that line
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
No Interaction with Underside!
Quote:
![]() - Katie |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: No Interaction with Underside!
Quote:
![]() http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/pi...rrow=4&trows=3 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
bah. that isn't completely off the ground.
although, it is rather impressive. we planned our robot to d osomething like that, but then kinda ran out of additional weight, so redesigned our systems. |
|
#5
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Quote:
-Chris Last edited by Chris Hibner : 20-02-2002 at 15:59. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
A picture's worth
Sometimes a picture's worth 1000 words. Sometimes seeing isn't quite believing. Since you guys won't be at the GLR or the WMR, all I can do is invite you to watch us at Nationals.
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quick question with the goals being raised only 3 inches do you think that is safe enough from not being hooked on? What about an opposing robot just smashing into the goal and causing you to drop it. I don't believe lifting a goal is the answer because it causes too much vulnerablily to a robot. If someone knows what I am talking about or disagrees with me please reply
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok, i'll agree that the goal is off the ground, but a few question ,which you might not answer just yet...
1) How long does it take to get the goals in the air? 2) How strong is your arms? 3) What happens if you only have one goal? if you don't answer them, i understand. but, if you could, at least answer one of them. ![]() |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll save Chris and Kevin the work on this one :-) I havn't seen the robot pass the planning stages myself, but if you check out the link below, it answers all those questions. And you gain a hugh advantage by picking both goals up. Instead of a 130 pounds from the robot interacting with the floor, you have the 130 pound robot and two 180 pound goals. It's like trying to push a VW Bug vs a Semi. The semi has the clear advantage. And if they loose enough weight to put the cvt back on, I can pretty much guarentee no one is going to be pushing them around very easily.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&threadid=2619 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
What I meant to say...
Kevin,
I saw that picture in the gallery before - that's awesome! Great job, lol! What I meant to say was "I would like to see a robot that can lift the goals completely off the ground, high enough for a robot to go underneath!" Yea... ![]() - Katie |
|
#11
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
We'll wait for the competitions to start to reveal more.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not only is lifting two goals a good idea, but if they can be spun around at the same time, that would be awesome!!! Take a look at www.Team60.net
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
yes, but then you must get two goals, or else your robot will tip over and that's not good.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just posted the reveal for MOE 2002 (who can lift goals) heres a link to the thread:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&threadid=2718 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FIRST and Success: A Question of Definition | Madison | General Forum | 70 | 27-11-2002 08:42 |
| Small balls in 2001 competition | archiver | 2001 | 10 | 24-06-2002 03:59 |
| Curie Division Robots information... (not complete) | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 24-06-2002 03:13 |
| Just curious, how many robots could shoot or toss balls into the goal? | Alan Ing | General Forum | 7 | 13-05-2002 19:09 |
| How hard is it to pull a goal? | Ken Leung | General Forum | 19 | 17-01-2002 20:09 |