|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Currie SCAM Ranking
I’d previously published a list of all team qualifying average scores greater than 90. There were 50 teams on that list. But since there was a large variation in Regional Event averages (eg. 41 @ Pittsburgh; 73 @ West Michigan), comparing robots solely on the basis of average score is misleading…..So, I tried to neutralize the effect of Regional differences with an equation I called “Scoring Capability Analysis Model”. The acronym SCAM was purposely chosen so that no one would take this too seriously.
The SCAM number was calculated using the ratio of Team Average (TA) to Regional Average (RA) and makes an adjustment for performance consistency using the Team’s Standard Deviation (SD). The equation identifies teams that had high scoring averages relative to the other robots they competed against, and who also demonstrated consistently high scores – without a large variation from match to match. If you find yourself paired with one of these robots, expect a high score. If you’re competing against them, you might want to consider defense. SCAM = (TA-SD)/RA The Curie Division Top 10 SCAM Robots are: 1. 522 2. 233 3. 1114 4. 279 5. 66 6. 57 7. 11 8. 977 9. 292 10. 61 Honorable Mention goes to Teams 74, 224, 1243, 126, 175, and 302 (who all had scoring averages over 90, but didn’t make the top 10 SCAM list). |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A New Concept for the Tournament Structure in 2004 | Andrew | Rules/Strategy | 38 | 07-07-2003 12:30 |
| Ranking database. | Josh Hambright | General Forum | 9 | 11-03-2003 09:05 |
| top ranking in cali and ill | archiver | 1999 | 0 | 23-06-2002 21:55 |
| team ranking list for Curry division | tminard | Championship Event | 4 | 29-04-2002 18:33 |