Post-Season Human Player Opinion
Now that the season's over, what is everyone's final opinion on the involvement of the human player in this year's game? Personally, I liked it a lot, combining both human and robot skills together to get points, but I remember it being a big surprise to me at the kickoff and I wasn't sure how it would work out. Should they keep the level of human involvement the same next year? More? Less?
__________________
Boeing has its Phantom Works; Lockheed Martin has its Skunk Works; 1212 has our Lucky-if-it Works.
My Website; Team 1212; DOX; NAU(Tinsley Hall Resident Assistant, Golden Key Webmaster; SAACS; NRHH)
2003 AZ Regional 5th Seed Quarter-Finalist (Rookie Year- Thanks 57 and 624!!!)
2004 AZ Regional Leadership in Control Award, AZ Regional Champion (Woohoo! Thanks 330 and 585!!!), Newton 23rd Seed
2005 AZ Regional Delphi Driving Tomorrow's Technology Award, AZ Regional Finalist (Thanks 991 and 987!!!)
The Holy Hamster Motto: It's only temporary... unless it works.
|
Seeing a bunch of teams from Indiana and probably Michagin competing at the same time.... If I wanted to see that, I'd just go to the Championship in Atlanta. :yikes: - Barry Bonzack [more] 
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode