|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Teams that shouldve been picked in hindsight
I just want to see who everyone thought got snubbed in the alliance picking for Nats. And who had the best chance at winning something if they were picked. I was busy in Newton the whole time, and didnt see much else going on.
My newton snubs were-303-won NJ- 2nd in Annap-i mean come on. One of the best ball handling bots out there. I saw no reason why they shouldnt have been picked. I think they may have been better then 71. Also, my team, 25. We had a 3-4 record, but we had the most qualifying points in our division. We also were playing some good d in the matches. We took on 2 bots once, flipped and righted ourselves and then still got on the bar in a minute stretch. Any others out there? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Teams that shouldve been picked in hindsight
245 was a big Gali snub. they always hung, and they had the 2nd highest QPs out of all the teams at Nats. They were definitely "shafted" they will tell you about the shaft if you ask them
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Teams that shouldve been picked in hindsight
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Teams that shouldve been picked in hindsight
Quote:
woops-um-when a mod sees this close it |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Teams that shouldve been picked in hindsight
closed.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| Thanks to many teams at St. Louis | josh_johnson | Thanks and/or Congrats | 0 | 09-03-2003 22:17 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |
| Scoring and Defense. | archiver | 1999 | 10 | 23-06-2002 22:44 |
| Team Forum | Emily Jenkins | General Forum | 16 | 14-08-2001 00:37 |