|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
High Score tied at San Diego
I was told that 980 and 330 scored 230 at the competition in San Diego.
So, who's going to raise the scoring bar this offseason? You east coasters and midwesterners aren't going to let the West Coast share in your offensive glory, are you? ![]() |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
What do you mean "let us" Joe?
We arent going to let *them* outscore us! Cory |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
Yes, the high scoring match was 230. 980 and 330 it was just complete dominance on their part. They were teams 1 and 2, and together they created the 1st alliance. That match, 330 got to the bar quick, with 980 corraling flawlessly and great shooting.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't even think 980 got the 10 pt autonomous knock off that match, because of some great defense on the other side. Once 980 got the 2x ball, they rotated to go knock off the 10 pt ball, and then they were smacked by the movable goal maneuvered by the other team. Miraculously, them and 330 were still able to make 13 shots and cap the coal+ 2 robots hanging of course. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
who was in this match? 980 330 and who?
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
Quote:
The 230 mark will be broken at Battlecry 5 by the mighty northeast!!! You heard it here first. -Andy Grady |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
Quote:
<goes off to crunch numbers on how to do this exactly> |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
Quote:
(i added in 177 cause i forgot they where gonna be there and i forgot they hung =X) Last edited by Heretic121 : 25-05-2004 at 15:38. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
I am looking forward to seeing at least a 250 at IRI.
. . .perhaps, if no balls fall out of goals. |
|
#9
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
Quote:
Remember...we in the northeast are ready to start proving a point to all you crazy midwesterners...next year, ITS ON! -Andy Grady |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
According to some very rough calculations and some very rough assumptions as to how many balls can fit in a scoring area...
Well, if about 15 balls can fit into a stationary goal, and that is capped, and all four yellow balls are in there, that is a score of 190 right there. If eight balls can fit into the mobile goal, and that is capped, that is another 80. And if both robots hang, that is another 100. So we're looking at a rough, potential ultimate score of 370. I know that in a practice round with Hyper 69 at manchvegas, we scored well over 200 points when we filled up both goals (or nearly filled up), capped both, and then Hyper hung. Of course, that was during a practice match, and we were never able to duplicate that in a game, although we did get a score of 165 in our match together, I do believe... Kudos to whoever has these high scores! Oh, and also--if anyone breaks the high score, it will be an alliance of two teams like Hyper 69 and an efficient ball herder like our own. We may be trying to get into Battlecry, but we probably won't have enough kids to do it. Buzz doesn't have a bad ball herder, though... --Petey |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: High Score tied at San Diego
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What does the Chairman’s Award have to do with a robot contest? | Ed Sparks | Chairman's Award | 32 | 15-02-2004 13:39 |
| KSC awards | archiver | 1999 | 4 | 23-06-2002 21:59 |
| High score | Dave Hurt | Regional Competitions | 3 | 08-04-2002 03:39 |
| New High Score | Chief'sDad | General Forum | 1 | 05-04-2002 21:52 |
| Will your team behave badly this year? | Kris Verdeyen | General Forum | 19 | 07-02-2002 08:42 |