|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: And you thought you had cool omni-wheels
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: And you thought you had cool omni-wheels
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: And you thought you had cool omni-wheels
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: And you thought you had cool omni-wheels
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: And you thought you had cool omni-wheels
Quote:
Let's try some inductive reasoning: Assume the mecanum wheels do put 100% of the power forward. We know the gearboxes can't output more than 100%, so there can't be any force sideways. Therefore, the robot could not strafe sideways. However, we know that the robot can strafe sideways. Therefore our assumption is false. The mecanum wheels do not put 100% of the power forward. They behave just like regular omnis at 45* angles. You get a maximum of 71% [1/sqrt(2) as Warren put it] power by moving forward, reverse, left, or right. |
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: And you thought you had cool omni-wheels
<grumble> second time i typed this...$#%! jumpy touchpad</grumble>
Quote:
Quote:
assume that the robot is going forward, and the wheels are all spinning at the same speed (and going the same direction). the design of the wheels is what keeps the bot from moving from side to side. the front left wheel's rollers are 90 degrees to the front right rollers (and same for the back), and the front left wheel is 90 degrees to the rear left wheel (and same on the right). for a wheel to roll sideways, it would force the rollers from two other wheels to move 90 degrees perpendicular to the direction that they roll. notice that the motors don't do anything other than keep the wheels spinning at the same speed and direction. Last edited by RogerR : 26-06-2004 at 12:29. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: And you thought you had cool omni-wheels
I've been having a hard time proving this, but I believe this is the way both holonomic systems work:
efficiency as compared with wheels facing forward 100% speed 100% power output 1/sqrt(2) max force (obviously, at stall) It is pretty clear that force is 1/sqrt(2) because when the robot is pushing against something fixed, the force vector that the motor is creating is 45deg to the direction force is being applied. The other two claims aren't as simple. The only way I can attempt to prove them is through conservation of energy stuff, when I try to look at force vectors, they don't make sense. Anyway, assuming lossless omniwheels (no friction in lateral movement), 100% of power output goes in the forward direction. Even though there should be a force vector perpendicular to direction of movement, it does not use any energy because it the lateral movement is lossless. If power output is constant, speed must be also constant because max speed is is just the point where ffriction(v) = fmotor(v). (I think equivalent holonomic and straight wheels systems would require different gearing, though, because even if wheels are same sized, a revolution of a straight wheel covers further linear distance than what at 45deg) |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: And you thought you had cool omni-wheels
coolness!!!!
i must say these look way cool-- i bet many will try next year if the game can use them--that's what we did-- we found them useful fro the 2004 game later y'all enjoy the summer!!! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| You know you're from Wisconsin when ... | Katie Reynolds | Chit-Chat | 9 | 22-06-2004 22:09 |
| Battle Cry | 157#1Driver | Off-Season Events | 37 | 14-06-2003 05:43 |
| Favorite Michael Jackson Song | Mullet | Chit-Chat | 7 | 13-02-2003 20:39 |
| Lots of Wheels and F = u x N | archiver | 2001 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:37 |
| "Motors and Drive train edition" of Fresh From the Forum | Ken Leung | CD Forum Support | 6 | 29-01-2002 12:32 |