|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
How about a ball pit like at Chuck-E-Cheeze or having rollers (like on a conveyor) made out of PVC pipe? This wouldn't cover the whole field but instead form a "hazard area" that you could either try avoiding or designing a robot to deal with it. This would partially divide the field and your score could be partially based on how long it takes you to get across the field. You would either take the "scenic route" and avoide these but lose points or if your robot is capable ignore the hazards and go staight across.
Or I still like the snow idea. Nothing like seeing a robot on skis or a snowboard For the southern and southwest teams don't worry, we have plenty of snow up here and we'd be happy to ship you as much as you want. I might even try to convince those in New Hampshire to include snow in the KOP for you too! ![]() |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
Quote:
Anyways, the other thing I was thinking and I know it's been said before, is velcro. I like that concept.. I would divide the playing field into zones (circa: 2002) and make 3 zones the hooking material and 2 zones the soft material. It would be very hard to gain traction on either of the materials that make up velcro, unless you have the mating surface as wheels, which would be dissalowed if I designed the game rules, just because... ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
Quote:
Rok on! ya that would be so cool if it went back to the beginning with the corn stuff again. I think theysum year they should definetly do that again. I also think that ice would be cool too. slippery lol itd be tough. The carpet seems to boring haha |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
ooh, one more medium....jello!
it's mushy and wobbly - yet solid at the same time!!! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
Quote:
Along the same line of thinking... Astroturf... Its a diffrent surface from carpet, but you can still roll it up at the end of the Regional just like carpet. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
I was thinking a 3D structure would be fun to navigate on. Like a grating at one foot spacing made out of PVC pipe. Your robot could either bump along going in and out of the openings or stay up on the pipes for a smooth ride.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
Formica.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
Just a thought--why not a whole playground?
I mean, they're fairly compact, can be configured a bajillion ways, and can be disassembled pretty easily (so it seems). Stick some cameras inside so everyone can see, and bada-bing! You can practice at McDonald's. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
So far, I have read about changing the field surface and size. I haven't heard anybody mention changing the robots instead of the field, other than the "water game" idea. What if they changed the game so that wheels could not be used for traction? I remember a team in 2003 that actually had a series of legs that walked instead of using wheels. I think it was team 276. Whoever had a cow mascot that year and designed their robot to look like a cow. Anyway, I think it would be cool to change the way you move.
Another option could be to change where you start from. Instead of starting on the ground level, start on top of a platform or on a wicked angle. If you give enough angle or change the way it is used, carpet can become very bad for traction. Imagine what would've happened if they put the carpet on the platform and put the HDPE on the floor this year. Changing the field surface is a good idea, but maybe changing the way they are used would be more practical. Maybe its a bad idea, but those are my thoughts. ![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
Masonite - shiny side up cheap and extremely slick. I like plywood also.
and for a twist dynamic smaller obstacles/challenges the field can be set up by your opponent with small ramps balls barrier whatevers of thier choice in say like 30 seconds. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question of the Week!!! (7/26/04)
I think plywood is definitely a good idea...its cheap and almost anyone can get their hands on it. How about sheetrock?? Also, what if you had a playing field that used materials differing from eachother radically, for example, alternating bands of rubber and lexan. That would make it really challenging to design your drive train to handle radically different conditions. I could just see robots with good traction on rubber slide out of control once they hit a slippery surface...this would create a need for good driving skills.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question of the Week!!! (7/19/04) | Andy Grady | General Forum | 23 | 23-07-2004 13:21 |
| Question of the Week!!! (6/14/04) | Andy Grady | General Forum | 23 | 01-07-2004 15:54 |
| Question of the Week!!! (6/21/04) | Andy Grady | General Forum | 36 | 23-06-2004 20:02 |
| Question of the Week!!! (6/3/04) | Andy Grady | General Forum | 17 | 03-06-2004 22:01 |
| Question of the Week!!! (5/24/04) | Andy Grady | General Forum | 17 | 25-05-2004 16:32 |