|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [moderated] Spare Parts Rule for 2005
In the FIRST community it is necessary to trust teams to a certain extent in order to keep from spending hours and hours in inspection at each competition. As members of the organization we should just take the rules that are given and not try to push them. The more we push the rules, the more confusing and restrictive they will become. I really dont want to see the day where we have lawyers to interpet the rules. Come on guys, lets not try to push the rules. In reality the rules should use half the paper they do now, but due to people feeling the need to find loopholes they have grown to be huge. My opinion is just wait until we get the spare parts rules and just follow them without questioning and pushing them.
just my opinion -aaron |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [moderated] Spare Parts Rule for 2005
Sorry Ken,
I messed up when I was trying to reply to your message and overwrote it. Too tired - so sorry, I'll call Brandon and see if he can fix it. Mike PS - I agree with your post. Last edited by meaubry : 09-12-2004 at 20:18. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [moderated] Spare Parts Rule for 2005
Much as I like being limited to 6 weeks for personal and family reasons, I have always found many of FIRSTs rules governing when and how you can work on your robot are totally bizarre. Think about...In what other sport or competition involving machines are you ever disallowed from servicing, maintianing, improving or practicing with your machine. I my life I have been invovled with racing car, motorcycles, snowmobiles, and other robot challanges. In no other league I have ever seen do they take away your machine and deny you the right to make it better if you can.
To me the question is and has always been: What would really change if we could do whatever, whenever we want so long as the machine on the field is legan and safe? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [moderated] Spare Parts Rule for 2005
I believe that the $3500 cap should include spare parts because some teams do not have enough bank to support that amount of spare parts. Our team for this year's competition had a $1,000 for parts along with whatever we could make in the metal shop. Needless to say this wasn't a lot and we were not able to compete as well as other teams.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [moderated] Spare Parts Rule for 2005
Though This is my first year as part of team ROKS, (Robotics Of Kearsarge Sunappe), I have been told that in the 2004 competition, the teams where limited to spending 1 thousand dollars on extra parts. Wouldn't that include "spare parts?" (spare parts defined as any extra parts) P.S. As stupid as this may sound, how do I post my own tread?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [moderated] Spare Parts Rule for 2005
Quote:
Since you're new & unfamiliar with the rules, you should quickly read them over. You can find them at http://www.usfirst.org/robotics/doc_updt.htm |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PLEASE RESPOND: NRLB & Spare Parts at Nats | ngreen | Championship Event | 12 | 23-04-2004 16:06 |
| Must Return Spare Parts to Small Parts? | Pierson | Rules/Strategy | 10 | 20-03-2004 09:34 |
| Rules on making spare parts fyi | DougHogg | General Forum | 0 | 02-04-2003 16:18 |
| Spare Parts Table | Jeremy Davis | Technical Discussion | 2 | 09-03-2002 23:40 |