|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Criteria for tetra manipulators
This stuff is obvious to most people, but I made this to hand to rookies before they start giving me wild and unpractical designs on monday. It's a draft, so I'm open to suggestions on it.
Attached to this post is the same outline, except it is in a word document and properly formatted. Criteria for tetra manipulators 1) RELIABILITY a) Ease of use2) VERSATILITYb) Dropping 3) SPEED Other desirable features: 1) The ability to correct the robot after tipping. 2) A low center of gravity to prevent tipping 3) Low weight 4) Quickly serviceable Last edited by ClicheCow : 09-01-2005 at 19:10. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Criteria for tetra manipulators
Quote:
Remember to design with autonomus in mind! What's easy for a driver to use may not be easy to program for... |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Criteria for tetra manipulators
I agree autonomus mode is very important to the arm design otherwise you severly limit your autonomous options later on
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Criteria for tetra manipulators
I took your suggestions and updated the post above. I also added a few more things. Again, this is mostly basic stuff (low center of gravity, light weight, etc), but hopefully it will help some of the rookies in the team generate ideas.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| URGENT storyboard criteria | Darcolx | 3D Animation and Competition | 8 | 22-02-2004 18:08 |
| Should the judging criteria be changes? | thoughtful | Website Design/Showcase | 11 | 02-01-2004 18:38 |
| Championship Eligibility Criteria | Joe Lambie | Rumor Mill | 2 | 26-08-2003 22:25 |
| Regional qualifying criteria? | patrickrd | Regional Competitions | 1 | 25-09-2001 20:41 |