|
|
|
 Inventions are not built using premade parts. People come up with new ideas, from different angles and with renewed enthusiasm. Playing the game is fun, building and designing is inspirational. - Steve W [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
auto vs. manual loading zone, which one?
From my experience it seemed like the majority of teams seemed to favor the human loading station over the auto loader. Granted some of the robots were not capable of using the auto, but it seemed like it was used a lot less frequent than planned. From time to time, I also noticed robots were simply just waiting to get onto the human loading zone, when the auto's were open.
We were quite capable of using the auto loader, but we had trouble getting up on even that small piece of wood (due to the front omni wheels) I would try to go fast to get onto the triangle, and I always ended up knocking the tetra down with the force of the robot crashing into the side. My questions are which one did your team use the most and why? also, if anyone had omni, or "wonder", wheels in the front, did you encounter the problem of getting onto the zone? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tetra auto loading zone clarification... | Gary C | Rules/Strategy | 21 | 24-01-2005 13:03 |
| Loading Zone Questions? What needs to be in... | CatchRothy22 | Rules/Strategy | 7 | 18-01-2005 11:59 |
| Question: Missing Tetras in Human Loading Zone? | tribotec_ca88 | Rules/Strategy | 7 | 15-01-2005 15:26 |
| Pushing robots out of loading zone | jgannon | Rules/Strategy | 24 | 09-01-2005 18:01 |
| Automated Loader without being in loading zone | geeknerd99 | Rules/Strategy | 3 | 08-01-2005 21:57 |
Threaded Mode