|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Quote:
I think 237 should have been picked, they had a great robot! I also think some of the teams (at least in Galileo) should have been picked higher than they were. It was still fun though. Quote:
![]() |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
There was definately a lot of confusion and problems in the Galileo department. I was dissapointed with how things were run. There were some teams who came off the field and didn't even get to go back to the pit before pickings had started. No one even knew the placings. We ended up 25th, and capped no less than 4 a match, averaging 5 and there were teams that were capping only 2-3 a match getting picked. all this to say that a lot of random stuff was going on. (ugh, we lost a match by 1 point and one by 2 points as well which would have put us in 3rd, oh well life is a bummer). but i still had fun at nats! congrats to everyone who did well.
Oh and i was also surprised 358 wasn't picked, sorry guys! Ben Team 281 |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Quote:
Thanks ben281. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
7, 75, 222, 237, and 1251 should have all been picked. 237 should have been a first round pick
Quote:
Last edited by Mike Ciance : 27-04-2005 at 13:54. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
TJ Squared
Last edited by katiyeh07 : 25-04-2005 at 18:35. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
One team that I was really surprised to hear didn't make the finals was 1403. They were our partners at the Buckeye Regional and they were amazing. At one point in the finals I was paying attention to our robot the entire match and at the end of the 2 minutes I looked up and 1403 had single handedly capped the entire opponent’s home row. Tough break you guys, I can’t wait to see what you come up with next year.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Quote:
Thank you. We tried hard, but it happens. This just motivates us to build an even stronger robot for next year. We'll see you in Ohio again next year. GO 1403!!! |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
I was also surprised that team 138 wasn't picked. They were our first choice at BAE. (we ended up being finalists) Our scouting system was not very good at BAE (It basically consisted of "Who do you think is good?") and none of us were quite sure how they would do. They ended up being a great pick. (and also a very nice group of people) I was really happy that they ended up getting to play. I was also sad to see that teams 007 and 122 who we were with in Annapolis were not picked. They were both really good. I definitely agree that there should be more time in between the end of qualifying matches and the begining of picking. Due to the limited time between the end of our last match and the beginning of alliance picking, the person who usually does our alliance picking (our human player) and I (the scout captain) didn't make it to the field until we had already made our first pick. Thank god our driver knew who our first choice was and had the opportunity to pick them. We then figured out our second choice by making hand signals (this is difficult as I do not have 108 fingers and there were quite a few teams in our division who's team number had the numbers 1 and 8 in it) and finally writing numbers on the back of our scouting sheets and holding them up. We have developed a very objective scouting system (which I am very proud of) which works really well and nearly ensures that we don't overlook good teams, no matter what their seed. However, at BAE our scouting system was purely subjective and I am sure that we overlooked good teams simply because no one remembered them. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Thanks to all those recognized our robot! Yeah, we were dissapointed we didn't get picked but that's just how the game goes. We don't seem to have great luck getting picked at nationals. We went undefeated at nats in 2003 and were seeded in the top 15 and didn't get picked. So, as I claim, we still went "undefeated" at the 2003 nationals.
As for teams I feel should have been picked... 237, 1403, and 25 all stick out in my mind. They were all amazing at the NJ regional. 222 was also a great robot. Hopefully we'll see you all in our division next year! |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Quote:
GO 1403, 75, 237, 1279, and 25!!! |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
I know its been said, but I have to say it again:
237- they were awesome in finger lakes, and they were one of thye few teams that could actually cap a vision tetra in auto. Plus, they worked really well in a team. 301 - These people were also awesome, controlling the home row for us in detroit. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Quote:
Re: those Mechanical Issues- Last weekend at PARC throughout the day we once again had the same mechanical issues and the mast mechanism seemed to be getting slower and slower. It totally shot the seeding rounds while we replaced the motor and tried to trouble shoot what was wrong. It turns out that at Nats when we uncrated the robot we had told the kids who worked on the robot to check all the screws and make sure nothing was loose or missing- simple procedure. So they did- and tightened down all the loose screws they found- Including all the axle hubs for the pulleys inside the tower making the entire mechanism a lesson in friction. There was enough power to move the tower but the resistance eliminated the ability to lift tetras. At lunch at PARC we finally noticed the error and fixed it. Needless to say- the elimination rounds went MUCH better..... This is how you learn.... WC |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
I was surprised when 222 and 25 didn't get chosen. They've built amazing robots over the past couple years I've known them, and when I heard they did not get chosen, I was astonished. From what I heard from Mike on 25, they lost almost every match.
Bad alliancing usually happens, and mistakes are made. Poor scouting is always a factor as well. I would suspect that teams look at how the alliance does, not the robot itself. That's a problem I think should be fixed in team scouting plans. Look at the robot, guys, not the alliance. Big mistake. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Since bad scouting (or rather, being in an unexpected picking position or inexperience) is the reason for much of this, perhaps FIRST should try to do something about it. Maybe they could post the overall stats of their teams on their website or maybe let each team make a statement about themselves and why they should be picked and should display it. I know it sounds wierd....but if it's a problem basically every year, FIRST should perhaps do something to help.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Official 2005 Game Design] Radical Tournament Ideas | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 42 | 26-04-2005 19:19 |
| Teams that shouldve been picked in hindsight | Corey Balint | General Forum | 4 | 26-04-2004 22:16 |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |