|
|
|
 I just think the teams that will be winners will have a higher score then us :) - Kyle [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| I just think the teams that will be winners will have a higher score then us :) - Kyle [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Success of the #1 seeds at the Championship Event
For reference, you should read Karthik's original thread here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=29678. The gist is that #1 seeds usually win their divisions at championship. In 2001, 2002, and 2003 3 #1 seeds won, and 2 #1 seeds won their divisions in 2004.
Now lets look at this year. * 1 #1 seed won their division o Archimedes #1: 245, 217, 766 * 3 division champions were #2 seeds o Curie #2: 175, 33, 108 o Galileo #2: 56, 254, 64 (Championsip Finalist) o Newton #2: 330, 67, 503 (Championship Winner) * 2 #1 seeds were division finalists o Curie #1: 337, 1510, 85 o Newton #1: 910, 135, 537 * 1 #1 seeds were division quarterfinalists o Galileo #1: 1089, 1280, 365 Anyone have any ideas why the #1 seeds didn't do as well this year as in year's past? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Welcome 2005 FRC Championship Teams! | Andy Brockway | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 1 | 04-04-2005 16:33 |
| Success of the #1 Seeds at the Championship Event | Karthik | Championship Event | 7 | 23-07-2004 02:09 |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| Championship Qualification - Constructive Criticism | Andy Baker | Championship Event | 7 | 29-10-2003 16:48 |
Threaded Mode