|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
10 Balls per second?
Last edited by Travis Covington : 15-01-2006 at 00:40. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
Please, that would ruin all of the fun... this IS the rumor mill afterall.
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
What really is the advantage of shooting in all 10 that fast? What do you plan to do afterwards? Sit there? Try and have the robot block another?
I mean, personally, my team will be glad if we can accurately shoot 10 balls within the auto mode time. As to how fast we'll do that, that'll depend on how quickly we setup our system. I guess this just raised that old speed vs. accuracy thing in my head. But it seems like the accuracy was good here eh? It also seems like all the balls were shot from the same point (they all seemed to follow a close arch) what about the advantage to being able to shoot while moving? (did I say that out loud...) I'm not trying to be negative, it looks really kool (assuming it's even a robot ), I'm just trying to toss some thoughts out there...Last edited by Sachiel7 : 14-01-2006 at 03:17. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
Quote:
Great job 968, and thanks for posting it! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
theres only 9 seconds if they were exactly lined up with the goal at the beginning. you are forgetting that it takes time to move from the start and aim at the goal.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
Still, having a robot that fires way faster than it can gather and load seems to only be an advantage when it's pre-loaded (i.e., one time during the entire match). For example: you can have the fastest machine gun in the world, but what good does it do you if you have to reload every .5 seconds?
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
hmmmmm well even though the video is 2 seconds long you can get a bunch of info from it
1. The video there showing is from a head on shot not a side shot so this auto mode will take more then 1 sec. 2. you can hear the balls but nothing shooting them 3. the ball are falling down not shooting up nice try guys i hope you can pull it off but this is not a robot shooting balls shaun ps there a ton more evedence in the video of why this is not a robot cannon you will see in a comp look carfully. shaun |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Mind tricks on CD?
*Hand wave*
There is no robot. Wetzel |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
On my PC I definately hear some type of machinery running before the balls hit the goal.
If the balls have been fired from ground level they will arc up in flight, then they will be 'falling downward' on the tail of there flight - so I dont see any evidence that proves this video is contrived. very impressive! being able to launch ten balls at once means you have more time for everything else and for dramatic effect you can use the first 3 second of auton mode to get into position, wait 6 more seconds, then fire them all off. The most dramatic shot in basketball is the one that just goes in as the buzzer sounds in your case, it will be ten going in. excellent demo. This will definately get some people thinking out of the box! Engineering is like magic sometimes. Once you see someone do something impressive or new, you know there is system behind it, so the challenge then is to figure out how they did it. BTW: Nobody would take the time to setup an elaborate shooter hoax/con and post it on CD, when they are so busy working on their robot. "Hey instead of working on our robot this morning, lets make a fake launcher video and post it on CD to freak everyone out!" I dont think so! Last edited by KenWittlief : 14-01-2006 at 12:29. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
You cannot "Drop" balls into a goal like that per-se. They must be shot somehow. It doesn't mean that they have to shoot them UP, but they must be given some forward motion. Also, it looks like one of the balls reaches it's apex slightly after it enters the frame, offering evidence that they were shot. I'm going to say this is not a hoax, and to be VERY VERY affraid!
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 10 Balls per second?
Quote:
You have just got to love the rumor mill... ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| POLL: have small balls been abandoned? | Solace | General Forum | 44 | 04-09-2004 17:53 |
| New Jersey Regional Status | Aignam | Regional Competitions | 144 | 21-07-2004 17:04 |
| Thoughts on the competiton balls | Petey | Regional Competitions | 26 | 14-03-2004 09:31 |
| Team 188 Pictures - four big balls anyone? | archiver | 2001 | 6 | 24-06-2002 01:03 |
| Will ANYONE mess with the black balls? | archiver | 2001 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:35 |