|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Which system is prefered and realisticaly the best | |||
| One Joystick for left wheels, one for right |
|
63 | 69.23% |
| One joystick for speed, one for turning |
|
2 | 2.20% |
| one joystick for everything |
|
20 | 21.98% |
| Our robot doesnt use that drive system |
|
6 | 6.59% |
| Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
clearly, a dance dance revolution pad is the way to go as to how to control the robot. just kidding
I don't think FIRST would approve...seriously though, when I was the base driver last year, our team experimented with both the one stick and the two stick drive. I prefer the two stick drive because it allows for versatility and it is easy to make small adjustments. Also, the two stick system allows me to rotate on a dime and on the fly. It is easy to maneuver. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
I recall (My brain's fired from a Bio Test) one year the toggle box with all the controls had two key switches:
1. Changed the direction of the tank drive. Forward was backwards and vice versa to allow quick controls 2. Switched between 1 joystick control for movement and tank drive. Whether or not they were helped I don't remember but the First switch got a few nods for use that year (Zone Zeal) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
Team 319 is a Tank Drive.. we have used it for a long time... but this year we might try to make a Xbox control work with the system... or a PS2...
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
We've used both in the past. Most of the time, we consult our drivers and see what they would prefer. After all, they are the ones interfacing with the machine most frequently!
Quote:
As far as finding a steering wheel goes, I think we brought one in from someone's old collection and modified the connector. It worked just fine. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
No joysticks!
Thats right, the 492 base driver will not ven be using a joystick this year. I don't wana spoil the suprise so you will just have to watch the PAC NW regional 1st week. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
A former student on our team, Daniel Gutmanas, came up with a code for perfect driving using just one joystick (nothing to do with the default code).
You can find all the information here: http://www.avivrobotics.net/tutorials/mixing.pdf Also visit our team's site : http://www.avivrobotics.net correction: In the article he wrote team 1557, meaning team 1577# - steampunk robotics (all those sleepless nights programming kinda confused him) ![]() Last edited by David55 : 01-02-2006 at 10:25. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Driving control scheme?
1 stick or 2...
This is always a hot debate in the FRC. Please see my comments (and those of others) from 2003 in this thread: one stick or two stick drivv? Eric |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Concept of PID explained | ConKbot of Doom | Technical Discussion | 11 | 27-01-2008 00:11 |
| Control Scheme | Drok00 | Control System | 5 | 19-01-2006 16:57 |
| Best Driving scheme? | Issues | Programming | 6 | 16-11-2005 15:53 |
| 2005 RadioShack Innovation In Control Award--What Won? | Billfred | Control System | 8 | 12-06-2005 01:51 |
| How did you control your Robot? 1? 2? Wheel? How? | ChrisCook | Control System | 9 | 17-05-2005 21:41 |