|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: How are you changing the default drive equations? | |||
| Not changing them, just using the regular 2-joystick tank drive |
|
7 | 14.58% |
| Just switching to the single-joystick default drive equations |
|
7 | 14.58% |
| Making joysticks be more sensitive around 127 and less so farther out |
|
4 | 8.33% |
| Making joysticks be less sensitive around 127 and more so farther out |
|
10 | 20.83% |
| Having a switch that when flipped makes joysticks more/less sensitive |
|
2 | 4.17% |
| Using a tank drive, but none of the above |
|
7 | 14.58% |
| Using some sort of parabolic drive equation |
|
5 | 10.42% |
| Using some sort of exponential drive equation |
|
4 | 8.33% |
| Totally changing drive equations: using an omni/ball/holonomic drive |
|
9 | 18.75% |
| My team doesn't plan to have a moving robot this year. |
|
1 | 2.08% |
| My robot's a hovercraft! |
|
10 | 20.83% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Drive Equations
How many of you are remapping your drive equations from what they are in the default code? If so, how?
An example of a remapping would be to make the joystick less sensitive around 127 and more sensitive farther out. This can enhance control. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Drive() Not a Standard Toolset in EasyC? | Chris_Elston | Programming | 3 | 08-02-2006 09:01 |
| If you could change one thing.... | Koko Ed | General Forum | 48 | 31-03-2005 19:23 |
| Drive Straight C Code using Encoders without PID? | Chris_Elston | Programming | 17 | 15-02-2005 23:41 |
| What is wrong with this code???? It won't Compile and I don't know why? Please Help | CrashZero | Programming | 23 | 26-03-2004 09:44 |
| "Motors and Drive train edition" of Fresh From the Forum | Ken Leung | CD Forum Support | 6 | 29-01-2002 12:32 |