|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UTC Regionals Team 126 GaelForce
Quote:
I can assure everyone that the 177 alliance in no way violated any rules during the UTC regional. To say that our team intentionally violated rules to block your shooter in autonomous is reckless and I seriously hope that you do not represent the opinion of your team. The only time that you were blocked you was in SF1-2, and you didn't even run the same program that you ran in SF1-1, so you obviously changed something. We have the utmost respect for your team and it is unfortunate that you see the elimination in such poor light. With respect to defense and pushing, we again did not intentionally tip anyone or violate any rules. We were pushed onto the ramp numerous times and even pined up there once by your alliance, team 20. We did not fall and were able to maneuver and re-enter the playing field, but that action by 20 was legal and in no way different than any defensive posture that we took. We apologize if either robot was damaged and I can assure you that was never our intention. The FIRST world is not a perfect but the referees and judges did an amazing job given the circumstances as the field broke and they had to resort to manual scoring. They even went as far as having manual time keepers to assure that everything was fair. Great job! Great job 20, 126 and 571. Can't wait to see you in Atlanta! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: UTC Regionals Team 126 GaelForce
I had a great time at the UTC Regionals, as an oberver, and as the operator/shooter for Team 20. I was very happy when our mentor, Paul Kane won the Woody Flowers award, he started our team, and was very deserving of the award.
With regard to the competition and semifinals, I believe that the Bobcats and their alliance played a very strong defense. At the same time, I believe they were too aggressive, forcing our robot around even when we were in no position to affect the outcome of the match. At the end of the round we were way down in points, yet we were still forced up the opponents ramp by two robots, and tipped over. Effective defense yes, gracious professionalism, no. I believe it was uncalled for, and caused unnecessary damage to our robot. I recognize that it could have been an accident, and someone might have been carried away in the heat of competition. I realize that this is a physical game, but there are limits. Anyways, congrats to the winners and all who participated. I am eagerly awaiting the national competition, where I hope to see as many great competive robots as the UTC regional. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UTC Regionals Team 126 GaelForce
177's strategy was to play defense on 20. I assume this was under the impression that if 20 cant pick up balls, they cant score.
I did not see anything from the stands that would imply the Bobcats were playing unnecessarily hard. Either did the refs. 177 won the match fair and square. Sorry. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: UTC Regionals Team 126 GaelForce
I was the one of the drivers for team 358 and was amazed by the power of the Bobcats drivetrain. It was a well built machine and I had a particularly good time facing off with them in the finals. I was not dissapointed in the least to have gone up against them and came out #2. It was a powerfull alliance both in robot strenght and shooting ability. In my eyes it was a great alliance worthy of the gold.
Thanks for a great regional, and I hope to see you all in Atlanta. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: UTC Regionals Team 126 GaelForce
Quote:
<T09> Prior to each match, teams shall indicate to the queuing manager their choice of available starting positions for that alliance. Once starting locations are selected, teams must place their robot in the selected location. Robots may not be repositioned in response to robot positions of the opposing alliance. During elimination rounds, teams may orient their robots within the selected locations once the robots are placed on the field. The higher seeded alliance will have the last opportunity to orient their robots within the selected locations. during SF1-1 we saw your robot aimed diagonaly to intercept us. we decided to run the auto mode that had the robot stay in its starting box and shoot balls. during SF1-2 you lined the robot up so it was aimed directly at us. upon seeing this we selected the mode that has the robot drive out a few feet then shoot. all 6 teams then went behind their respective driver stations and the announcer was about to announce the teams when your team went back onto the field and angled your robot, which obviously meant that you violated rule T09 as you did not give us, the 1st seed, the final opportunity to reallign our robot in respect to your orrientation. im sorry for your confusion, but i just wanted to make sure that you understand that rule. i can assure you that we will not let this rule slip by us next time as we will step forward and let the refs know that we need to reposition our robot in respect to our opponents. this is a very critical rule, as it could determin the outcome of the game. wining autonomous mode and gaining the 10pt bonus is a critical strategic manuever in this years game. my two cents congrats to teams 177, 176, and 1124, see you in atlanta! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: UTC Regionals Team 126 GaelForce
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: UTC Regionals Team 126 GaelForce
Amen,
This issue is no longer whether rules were violated. It is (as Mel had said above me) how the teams handle the loss. Over the past few years there have been rules which are not totally clear. Most teams (including 176) feel that they may have lost a competition due to ref or field error at one point or another. There is absolutely nothing you do about what happened. If anything you are just making it worse. Just recently we had someone sign up as a member to our forum and spam it saying that we suck. This is not what FIRST is about. Keep in mind when arguing about the rules that no matter how much you complain nothing will happen. Keep in mind FIRST's motto "Gracious Professionalism". I am not saying it is not ok to argue your point, just please keep it professional. Remember your grandmother could be watching ![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UTC Regionals Team 126 GaelForce
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Death of FIRST | Anton Abaya | General Forum | 23 | 03-05-2006 17:18 |
| Why do teams voluntarily do FIRST without adult technical mentors? | Andy Baker | General Forum | 127 | 05-12-2005 08:08 |
| What's the best organizational structure for photos? | maikull | Chit-Chat | 2 | 17-03-2005 17:47 |
| First Year Team Assistance - MOEmentum: FYI | Mr MOE | General Forum | 0 | 07-01-2005 14:07 |