|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
declining alliances
under the new selection system, would it be more advantangeous for teams who are not picked in the first round (but are still fairly decent) to decline the second round offers of the lower seeded teams?? this way, they can be picked by a higher ranked seed later in the second round... of course this is assuming that something was worked out with the pickee (seeded picker) to ensure that they will be selected. this will result in what happens in previous years, whereas the top seeded teams often destroyed (literally and metaphorically) the lower seeded teams in the QFs. does this actually happen? do you think it is going against the wishes of FIRST, and should not, or is not allowed to happen?? And do you think it really matters that much should onego to that extent to so called "rig the game"? what are your thoughts?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: declining alliances
because of this exact strategy...if you are picked and decline you cannot be picked again.
the rule book is your friend |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: declining alliances
Unless you are an alliance captain, if you decline an invitation you don't get to participate in the elimination rounds.
Read section 8.4.1 of the rules for details. Another example of why you need to read ALL the sections of the manual. Wetzel |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: declining alliances
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: declining alliances
If you are being picked in the second round (re, you are not a team in teh top 8) you must accept or you are out of the competiton..
Only those teams in the Top 8 can decline, and even then, they can't even be picked again, but they can make their own alliance. I dont' understand your question. Go read the manual and it explains why what you are asking can not happen. edit: w0w.. 4 people beat me to it in a matter of a minute. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: declining alliances
Quote:
The new rule this year about reversing the order of picking after the first round, corrects many of the faults with the previous system but requires greater strategy and data before selection. No team should go to alliance picking without at least 5 top choices, no matter where you finish. Be Prepared! (Boy Scout Motto) |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: declining alliances
wow that was some fast reaction, thanx guys. I definitely didn't read the rulebook close enough
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Alliance picking | Shu Song | General Forum | 44 | 13-04-2005 19:29 |
| [OCCRA]: Top Ranking Teams Picking Alliances | Lisa Perez | OCCRA Q&A | 1 | 15-11-2004 20:31 |
| Division Alliances | Jeff Rodriguez | Championship Event | 18 | 19-04-2004 01:57 |
| Thank You! to our alliances from 'Aces High' Team 176 | archiver | 1999 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:49 |