Heck Re-Freezes - Apple's Boot Camp

[Greg McCoy]

I can't wait for the virtualizaton...it's only a matter of time. I use Virtual PC on my PowerBook G4 quite a bit when I need to try/test something out in Windows. Even though it's slow, it's very convenient to have the ability to manipulate the virtual hardware to do what you want. You can try out different flavors of Linux, totally crash Windows XP and then just reload it from a DVD archive, debug stuff easier, etc. Much easier than dealing with real hardware. When the virtualization is mature on the Intel machines (and the performance penalty is gone), it will be wonderful.

Originally Posted by Andy A.

Just like an Ipod and using Itunes, you are stuck with a proprietary format that is a dead end. With a Mac you are even locked into what hardware upgrades are possible!

This is true in some respects, but I've found that a lot of their stuff is highly standards-based (XML Configuration Files, PDF graphics everywhere, they build everything with a highly compatible variant of GCC, etc.) You might be suprised

Originally Posted by Andy A.

It just blows my mind that finally, after something like 20 years, Apple is opening up it's hardware.

Apple has evolved a lot over the years...it's true that the hardware is probably more open now than it's ever been, but the fact that the hardware that their software can be deployed on is so small contributes to the fact that their computers are integrated so well. I think it's kind of funny that diehard Windows lovers like the hardware so much, like there's a secret to it. Their stuff is just plain simple, uncluttered. The difference is ultimately in the software.

Then again, I might just be an overzealous Apple fanboy.

[Rombus]

Originally Posted by Andy A.

It just blows my mind that finally, after something like 20 years, Apple is opening up it's hardware.

Its not too shocking when you think about it. They were forced to go to Intel by the PPC Chips. IBM just couldn't give what apple wanted, a G5 you could put in a powerbook. From day one i heard that there would be Intel macs, i knew OSX and XP would be interchangeable both on PCs and Macs. The thought of XP running on a powerbook, and OSX running on pc hardware is just too tempting to pass up. Even if it OSX on pc hardware isn't exactly legal or supported, it still works.

Essentially, Apple just made a brilliant chess move. By legitimizing the XP on intel mac hardware and giving the full set of mac drivers, they did three major things.
First, now professional users who are stuck using XP boxes for various thing have the ability to switch without much effort.
Second, it gives mac users who have yet to adopt the intel macs due to software incompatibilities (Think Adobe CS2) a reason to upgrade and still be able to use their software in a native OS, while waiting for native OSX86 support.
Third, you will have strict PC users start to look at the better designed and built hardware that Apple provides.

Apple also gets a nice side benefit of being able to grab home users who might feel comfortable with XP, but want to try the imacs or mac minis for there cost. Slowly these users might even migrate over to OSX.

You know what i REALLY want to see? a macbook tablet. I'm very addicted to my tabletPC but would unload this thing on ebay in a heartbeat if heard one was coming out. I'm sure alot of graphics professionals would also love to see one come out. And now with bootcamp, i would have the best of both worlds!