|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
Ever since I've been in FIRST (since 2003), there has always been a team that is mainly sponsored by one of the automotive companies.
In 2003, the Huskies (#65) sponsored by GM In 2004, The Martians (#494) sponsored by GM and DaimlerChrysler (I believe) In 2005, the Hot Team (#67) sponsored by GM In 2006, The Thunderchickens (#217) sponsored by Ford What about before this? Any other interesting connections between winners? Just curious... Last edited by Don Wright : 05-05-2006 at 13:00. Reason: my typing skills are lacking... |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
1998 - Team 45 - Delphi (and maybe still part of GM then)
The HOT team is #67 (you have 76). And I second what Richard said. Another connection - those listed so far are odd number teams. ![]() Oh wait, no they're not, because another typo - the Martians are 494.. not 949.. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
Also I think every year since at least 2002 a Michigan team has been a winner
2002 66 2003 65 2004 494 2005 67, 503 2006 217 If memory serves all of which have auto industry sponsors. Edit: I did some more checking and in 2001 team 279 was one of the champions. Last edited by Joe J. : 05-05-2006 at 12:04. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
I can't say it doesn't make sense though. There's more alignment with the auto industry than any other.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
I think that makes sense since Michigan has the most teams (I think...?)
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
In my 6 years of FIRST I have always wondered that. We were a GM team for 3 years and the 3rd year we though we were up for an award. As they were announcing the team we were up on edge everything described our robot to a T except the last word "s-clamp". As they started to read the number the team was a little confused but they didn't care because it would have been a first. they announce it 3....7.....8 the team let out a big sigh as they graciously clapped for 378 seeing we are 379. They are the Circuit stompers from Newfane NY. After GM backed out of sponsorship for us we seemed to never have a chance. If any year after 2002 to win one, it would be this year. This years robot was amazing, very simple, very very robust, the machinery was amazing, just simple the best robot I have ever seen from this team in my 6 out of the teams 7 years in existence. Our team had hoped for a quality award instead of winning the KPC&B Entre. award for the 5th time. We were disappointed that we did not win this award at all nor really be considered. I mean the kids described it as well as test it for the judges. I don't like to say my bot is better then your bot but one of the robots that won this award was right next to us in the pits and after carefully looking it over I decided that ours would be competition with them. After watching their robot perform I was a little confused. After the start of their 10 balls and they were dumped that was it that robot was done it couldn't reload, HP load or collect it just drove around and played "D". We went against them and pushed them all over the floor, reloaded off the floor, dumped in side goals and played some massive "D". Like I said I'm not one to brag or say my robot is better then yours but this year I was mighty proud of that robot and would have stayed up a month straight during competition season just to get noticed. The only reason I can think they received the award instead of us was because they were a GM,Ford,DC,Delphi team. I apologize if I offended anyone or bashed anyone, that wasn't my intention. My point was that there was a robot that won an award and our robot in my mind was up there with that robot if not a step ahead of them and they received the award because they were a Corporate name unlike us. (I would have found out for sure which one they were but the FIRST website is currently down)
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
First off this is my 100 post, go me. Anyhoo, there are teams that have big sponsors, like GM, Delphi, and Ford. You don't need a big sponsor to win. Every year that I've been apart of team 85, we've had at least 6-7 sponsors. Granted some of them were Herman Miller, Gentex, and ITW Drawform, all of them are big companies in the area. I think that the reason we have won awards in the past is that we have the students involved with the robot from start to finish. I'm not saying that all the other teams don't do this, But we want the students to do as much of the work as they can. I've been told a couple of times, while being handed a tool, "here you do this." or "here you put this together."
We have done very well with not only our robots, but also our presentations to the judges in the pits. Quote:
Anyhoo, the co-winky-dink that there are teams with a major automotive company as a sponsor that wins is cool. Now lets try and get the teams that hardly make it through the season and get them into the mix of winning championships and being counted like the major teams. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
As I skimmed through the thread, I didn't see it mentioned, but Big Name Sponsors tend to provide a little bit more financial backing/mentor support than say your average local business would...
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
I didn't want this to turn into a thread about the big named sponsors making it better or easier for teams to win. Or that other teams aren't inspired as much...
But, I was just curious about it... If 2002 added 66 (another GM team), then how far back does it go? |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
Quote:
But that is kinda cool, 2001 till now? Well we are sponsored by Ford indirectly, so maybe we can carry the torch next year. lol |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Automotive Company Sponsored Winners
I don't wish to sound rude or offend... or even complain.
That said, please take my opinion as just that - mine. Sometimes having a corporate sponsorship is harder because some people don't like you for it - granted not all, just some. From those people you get harassed. I have been on the receiving end of this before, but, thank God, not often. It shouldn't really matter who your sponsors are. Just work with what you have, to the best of what you can offer. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Championship Registration for Qualifying Regional Event Winners | Rich Wong | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 0 | 07-03-2005 22:51 |
| REGIONAL WINNERS LIST! | robbekid | Regional Competitions | 41 | 05-04-2004 22:19 |
| Full list of teams & competitions | archiver | 2001 | 14 | 24-06-2002 00:52 |