|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
pic: Tough cookkie frame
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
4 foot wheels? Wow!
but 4" wheels, yes, good think. yay for small wheels. Anyhow, that chassis would be illegal by this past year's rules right? Nice CAD model though. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
If you could get the motors and a custom transmission inside the frame it would make a good battle bot.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
Quote:
That said, it seems reminiscient of 179's 2005 design. Not that there was anything wrong with that one (cough)florida and palmetto champs(cough). Is there any advantage to the octagonal shape as opposed to the standard rectangle? |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Tytus Gerrish : 27-07-2006 at 15:02. Reason: Fixing my grammers |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
it would be illegal because the sides are more than 10 degrees from vertical
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
Have you decided what the 4" wheels would be? Are they those pimp Goped wheels again?
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
Quote:
Quote:
Again! just throwing ideas together No need to be so serious. |
|
#9
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
Quote:
Some input and questions: 1. Incorporating the AM Shifter side plates into your base frame would save you about 2" or maybe 3" of height. You can just buy the pieces individually and save some money, even. 2. How do you get chain tension between the wheels and from the gearbox to the wheel? All in all, it looks great. I assume that the metal parts of the frame are welded together. If this is not a battlebot, then the thickness of the plates don't need to be over 3/16", and some could even be 0.090" thick. Good job. Andy AB |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
Quote:
Quote:
i deffenatly did minimal effort here im thinking about a ratchet tensioner asembley like 233 has. Last edited by Tytus Gerrish : 27-07-2006 at 11:01. Reason: My VB code ROXORS My BOXORS |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
That frame is amazingly cool. It looks like it could take more of a beating than a FIRST bot could throw at it! As for weight, is there any estimate as to how much it would weigh?
|
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
WOW! Nice Work Ty!...
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Tough cookkie frame
Whats the weight on that setup?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Tough Drive Team And the Cat | Mike Nawrot | Extra Discussion | 6 | 05-05-2006 14:49 |
| pic: One Tough Train | Rod | Extra Discussion | 33 | 11-04-2005 21:33 |
| pic: 461's black frame | Logan Byers | Robot Showcase | 11 | 11-02-2005 22:16 |
| pic: Frame teaser222 | team222badbrad | Robot Showcase | 1 | 08-02-2005 15:53 |
| pic: 1123 Frame | ShadowKnight | Extra Discussion | 8 | 21-01-2005 09:20 |