|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The act(s) of being a kid banned in MA schools!
Dogdeball was removed from our school in it's entirety a few years ago. That ticked me off...
The problem is, Americans are sue-happy. Not all, but, the cliche holds true, and schools counter to avoid risk. In other communities, westerly and in more remote regions, this isn't nearly as much of a problem. Life in general is riskier, and parents are willing to take a bit more risk as their own responsibility. Unfortunately, especially in the NE, parents believe that when they send their kids away in the glistening cheese that first day of school, that they have, for aeven a short time, relinquished all control and responsibility for them. Whoohoo! Tax dollars doing something useful for once! However, as responsible adults know, this simply isn't the case. There are some legitimate reasons to sue a school district, but far too aften it's about pointing fingers, feel good vindication, and even cash. Ex: My brother in elementary school was running up a pipe ladder in a school playground during recess, slipped, bashed his face in, and had to go to the emergency room for stitches, concussion test, etc. Could've claimed negligence, or other things, but thats absurd. More serious... My friend has a brother that is seizure prone. He was playing on pull up bars, also during recess, fell off, on his head, began seizing. Negligence, imprper equipment, etc., but again, a frivilous lawsuit. At a local elementary school, kids in my grade tell stories about how cool it was to go back and play at the "pit". Which happened to be a waste dumping area, complete with rusting barrels. Parents found out, but they didn't sue the school, they just took responsiblity and told their kids not to play there anymore! Everyone knows a million examples of instances where there is an opportunity for a liability suit, but isn't action on it. It's the few, absurd people who feel the need to be an arse and sue for little reason. Districts need to cover their backsides, and the culture seems to permit this behavior. * Sorry, that was an exceptionally long rant... |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The act(s) of being a kid banned in MA schools!
Quote:
Also, this prevents kids from learning from experience. Well, like Elgin, if you slide in those half-frozen mud puddles and get dirty and wet and disgusting, you know not to do it. But oh no! They're not allowed outside when there are puddles! They could slip on it! I nearly got detention in elementary school for not wearing a jacket to school on a day they thought I should have been! Kids are so sheltered and babyed (babied?) these days. I say...LET THEM PLAY TAG! |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The act(s) of being a kid banned in MA schools!
Quote:
but they really can't stop kids from having fun and playing those games, there is always a way to get around the rule, and once that is found out they will find a different way. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The act(s) of being a kid banned in MA schools!
Wow... I still can't believe they banned tag.
I wrestled with my friends during recess and none of us ever got hurt. If they want to cut down on school injuries, keep kids inside during winter. One of my friends slipped during recess and broke his arm. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Act: Boston Trial of a new style of video game. | Joe Johnson | Chit-Chat | 0 | 06-10-2006 09:21 |
| What did you use a calculator for on the ACT??? | JoeXIII'007 | Chit-Chat | 8 | 27-12-2005 23:45 |
| I'm taking the ACT on Saturday...any advice? | IMDWalrus | Chit-Chat | 9 | 06-02-2004 10:02 |
| the beanie kid | lil$@R@H | Chit-Chat | 1 | 12-04-2002 16:20 |