The "What the!?!?!" Rule Thread

[Lil' Lavery]

Well, its about 36 hours until kick-off, and it happens every year. There's always a rule that seems to incite riots in the streets. People are flabbergasted, shocked, and awed. Well here's the [preemptive] thread for it when it happens. Have fun

[ChuckDickerson]

Should we speculate ahead of time what it will be or wait until Saturday and just complain about it?

[Lil' Lavery]

Originally Posted by DeepWater

Should we speculate ahead of time what it will be or wait until Saturday and just complain about it?

Just wait until saturday

[ChuckDickerson]

OK, but that sure takes the fun out of it.

[Steve W]

I suggest that everyone waits till Sunday when they have had lots of time to read and re read the rules. So many questions are answered when people actually read the rules.

[Peter Matteson]

Originally Posted by Steve W

I suggest that everyone waits till Sunday when they have had lots of time to read and re read the rules. So many questions are answered when people actually read the rules.

Well put Steve. I hope we don't have a situation like we normally incur here on CD where we continually answer questions by people who haven't read the rules at all. I hope we can be at a level where we just discuss the interpretation of rules (last year's shooter rule) or explain those which come across as unclear (last year's off board compressor rule).

[Lil' Lavery]

The intent of this thread was not really for clarification and questions about the rules, but really for commentary about the rules themselves. Each year there are always a few rules that are remarkable changes. The change in the draft system last year, the switch to 3v3 in 2005, the introduction of autonomous in 2003, the 4v0 scheme in 2001, the creation of alliances in 2000, etc. Even large changes to the gameplay and large variances from FIRST trends may be worthy of posting (such as not only allowing, but encouraging, projectiles in 2006).
There always seem to be a couple rules that bubble up every year, and this thread is for the discussion of those rules. But there is validity to what was posted, please know the rules before discussing them.

[Ian Curtis]

If we're voting for irritation factor, I'd say a large number of people are slightly annoyed at going out and buying new batteries.

As for the game, I've got a split vote. Carrying one tube at a time is interesting one, but I'd say the more exciting one is the whole changing weight based on changing height. Also, the scoring is logarithmic, how cool is that!

[Richard Wallace]

Originally Posted by iCurtis

...Also, the scoring is logarithmic, how cool is that!

Exponential. And yeah, that's cool.

[hallk]

The end game rules are really the only ones in my mind. They are just kinda new is all, like the penalties.

[Lil' Lavery]

I think the height/weight "classes" are probably the rule that is the most surprising to me. Especially considering it's not really game specific and we could see it again in the future.

[robind]

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery

I think the height/weight "classes" are probably the rule that is the most surprising to me. Especially considering it's not really game specific and we could see it again in the future.

For sure. Quite frankly I'm surprised they haven't done this in previous years.

What I am probably the most surprised about is the use of only one color for the targets. I guess I was sorta expecting multiple colors after the big hubbub at nationals.