|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
possible ramp/lift configurations
I was thinking about what it would be like to have a huge, unfoldable 12'' ramp that could be deployed into the home zone, right after atonomous. This would alow your alliance partners to get up on it, and it would bock a good deal, or all, of the oposing alliances rings. I know that it would be illegal to just leave something on the field, detatched... but what if you "re-attached" at the end? would that be allowed? Please give me your input.
Last edited by zander_108 : 07-01-2007 at 22:27. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
This sounds like a good idea if it is posable, I am not shure if the rules let you, please let me know. Thanks.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
Robots can't have a ramp deployed, unless they are in their home zone, because of tipping hazards. The robots probably don't want to get on top of another until the end. And you probably can't have a detachable component, i.e. a ramp.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
Can't have anything detach from your robot at any time, unless it's completely by accident. Even if you pick it back up. G40 is pretty clear. You can't intentionally detach part of your robot. If you could, I'd just as soon deploy a rack blocker on the opponent's side of the field and pick it up at the end of the match right before the bell.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
Ohh well... thats too bad.
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
<G40> states robots my not intentionally detach parts or leave multiple mechanisims on the field.
So If you detach then reattach later, you would have intentionally detached so it would not be allowed |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
just wondering... Does that still count as "attached" if its on a tether or cable?
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
as far as I know if it on a cable or tether it is still attacted to your robot... but then again if you deploy a ramp at the beginning you need ALOT of cable for your errands driving around, and then you would have to wind it all back up and make sure that it doesnt interfer with the other robots. Why are so many people stuck on a ramp anyways.. I mean I understand its easy, but so many questions about it lol
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
Also, consider that outside of the home zone any horizontal aspect can't exceed 72". In that aspect, the cable would be more of a leash.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
Quote:
does that refer to during the whole game or just when the robots are back in the home zone at the end? |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
Outside the home zone, the limit is 72". Inside, it's the size of the home zone. This applies all game. (See section 8 for details about size.)
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
You could still unfold your robot into a ramp setup that blocks your opponent's ringers, if you stay there the whole time.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
Quote:
![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
i think that even if you can leave a ramp at the home zone it counts as part of your robot and i cant think of a way to lift the ramp 10cm above the floor level
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: possible ramp/lift configurations
yes it is counted as attached. HOWEVER... i would not want to do that. I believe that it was back in 2002 many teams were making little "minibots" that were tethered to the "main robot" and would drive off into the home row just before the match ended. we happened to be one of the teams that did that. one team decided that they would purposely entangle themselves on our tether(no its true i'm not making stuff up), somehow it was considered our fault, and thus we didn't make it to the finals. So i leave you with my though on long tethers: bad idea.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Motor Ramp Up/Ramp Down Function | Tom Bottiglieri | Programming | 12 | 03-12-2006 23:31 |
| To ramp, or not to ramp? | phrontist | Rules/Strategy | 27 | 26-01-2006 17:56 |
| Lift on cart | loomisman | General Forum | 9 | 21-11-2005 16:13 |
| Robot Pit Lift | Burg | Pneumatics | 19 | 14-03-2005 19:38 |
| Extension lift mechanics | Steve Compton | Technical Discussion | 8 | 25-01-2005 15:47 |