|
|
|
 I enjoy the brainstorming that's going on here, you guys out think me most of the time. Keep it up. - fnsnet [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| I enjoy the brainstorming that's going on here, you guys out think me most of the time. Keep it up. - fnsnet [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Rendering: Pixel Aspect
I know we're supposed to render at 720 x 480.
What should the pixel aspect be? |
|
#2
14-02-2007, 20:35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rendering: Pixel Aspect
Image aspect 1.5
Pixel aspect 1 |
|
#4
15-02-2007, 19:56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rendering: Pixel Aspect
Okay... we have 2 opinions.
Does anybody know for sure? |
|
#5
15-02-2007, 21:44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rendering: Pixel Aspect
I am absolutely right, but pixel aspect is not a critical option.
Whatever pixel aspect you have, your animation will still have 720 pixels in a row and 480 pixels in a column. But, pixels in NTSC TV are not square. They are slightly squished. Setting the pixel aspect will have Max compensate for non-square pixels on a TV. This way, squares turn out square and circles turn out circular, and not rectangular or elliptical. Last edited by Mazin : 15-02-2007 at 21:44. Reason: "aspect," not "ratio"? |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pan Center Pixel | jdejoannis | Programming | 1 | 10-02-2007 08:18 |
| Wide aspect vs Narrow aspect | VanMan | General Forum | 10 | 26-02-2006 22:41 |
| 200 pixel preview? | Daniel Brim | CD Forum Support | 2 | 06-04-2005 15:56 |
| Teamwork Aspect | Cyberguy34000 | Rules/Strategy | 9 | 14-01-2005 08:14 |
| Least Important Aspect | Steve Howland | Rules/Strategy | 10 | 21-04-2004 20:28 |
Hybrid Mode
