|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Picking alliances
My best advice is to ignore the rankings and to make your own independent ranking system. We ranked teams this year based on average number of tubes scored per match and quality of ramps. Friday night me and another mentor were up to midnight at the Holiday Inn (BMR) making decisions on alliance selection...even though we were about 17 and didnt expect to be picking. However, we moved up on Saturday and then moved up to 7th seed during alliance selection. We ended up turning down the number 5 seed in order to select our own alliance. It actually payed off because we made it to the finals.
Should you sell your team? I think so. Selling your team can be the key to being selected, even though you may be a lesser known team. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Picking alliances
We didn't really sell as much as I would of hoped, so we didn't get picked unfortunatly. We would of made the top 8 if it wasn't for a few technicalities that lost us the game (SPOILERS!!!), the second day of seeding matches. We were one of the good, consistant, high scorers, but we had very little time to practice before ship, and the field team was a little shakey at the Philly Regional. If we had some more practice with the rack, we could of done some improvements beforehand instead of the practice day, which eventually led to missing more practice matches, etc.
All a learning experience, the best we can do now is prepare even more for next year. Hopefully we'll be attending the NJ regional as well as Philly and Nats, so we'll be an even stronger team than before - and maybe even become a finalist somewhere. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Picking alliances
1015 was in a simular situation at GLR:
We were seeded 45th out of 59. We did try to "sell" our selfs to the top teams. We felt that we were a lot better then our seeding rank. Based on 1504's scouting data we were the 8th best tube scorer (total of 18 in 8 matchs). We had some bad luck with partners and so on. It seemed like nobody really noticed us though, and we got picked 15th (by the 2nd alliance on the 2nd time arround!). Our scouters had talked with the 2nd alliance before, which may or may not have helped them pick us. Our alliance managed to win the competition! I think this was partialy because nobody noticed we were such a good tube scorer, and the 2nd alliance got to pick a reliable bot for a 3rd partner to make a good alliance. Anyways, I think that you should sell yourself if you have a great robot. Not all teams have great scouting data like 1504. I know last year we made it to the eliminations for the first time ever after 4 years. We were not prepared to pick partners and ended up not knowing who to pick really. So yes, teams dont know who to pick, and just letting them know who you are doesnt hurt anything. Just as long as you dont do it in the wrong way I dont think it is "desperate". |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Picking alliances
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Picking alliances
In the Florida Regional, SPAM Team 180 (us) picked Team 233 Pink and they were last seed. They were just unlucky and were paired with the wrong teams. We were 6th seed, and ended up losing in the Semi-finals...all 3 games. Pink exemiplified their great arm potential, and it showed in their scoring, not in their ranking. We wouldn't have been able to scout so well if it hadn't had been for our 30+ kids in the stands =).
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| declining alliances | geowasp | General Forum | 6 | 27-03-2006 18:13 |
| [OCCRA]: Top Ranking Teams Picking Alliances | Lisa Perez | OCCRA Q&A | 1 | 15-11-2004 20:31 |
| alliances | archiver | 1999 | 49 | 23-06-2002 22:43 |
| Tri-Alliances? | archiver | 1999 | 6 | 23-06-2002 22:16 |
| 3 Team Alliances | archiver | 1999 | 5 | 23-06-2002 22:13 |