Go to Post We're thinking of using static electricity to pick up the tubes. The programmers are trying to figure out how to make the robot shuffle it's feet on the carpet. - Tom Ore [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2007, 17:32
KTorak's Avatar
KTorak KTorak is offline
Fire Rescue 47
AKA: Kyle Dersch
FRC #1023 (Bedford Express)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Montgomery Village, MD
Posts: 899
KTorak has a reputation beyond reputeKTorak has a reputation beyond reputeKTorak has a reputation beyond reputeKTorak has a reputation beyond reputeKTorak has a reputation beyond reputeKTorak has a reputation beyond reputeKTorak has a reputation beyond reputeKTorak has a reputation beyond reputeKTorak has a reputation beyond reputeKTorak has a reputation beyond reputeKTorak has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to KTorak
Re: Picking alliances

My best advice is to ignore the rankings and to make your own independent ranking system. We ranked teams this year based on average number of tubes scored per match and quality of ramps. Friday night me and another mentor were up to midnight at the Holiday Inn (BMR) making decisions on alliance selection...even though we were about 17 and didnt expect to be picking. However, we moved up on Saturday and then moved up to 7th seed during alliance selection. We ended up turning down the number 5 seed in order to select our own alliance. It actually payed off because we made it to the finals.

Should you sell your team? I think so. Selling your team can be the key to being selected, even though you may be a lesser known team.
__________________
Kyle D- Myspace - Facebook
2008 Bedford Express Driver & Build & Design (Team) Co-Leader
2007 Bedford Express Driver & Build & Design (Team) Leader
2006 Bedford Express Driver, Build Team Member, & Board of Directors
2005 Bedford Express Rookie, Build Team Member & Robot Operator
-
2008 - GLR Quarter Finalist
2007 - GLR Finalist & Boilermaker Finalist & MARC Off Season Event Winner
2006 - GLR Johnson & Johnson Sportsmanship Award & Archimedes 7th Seed Quarter Finalist
2005 - GLR Finalist & Judges Award.
2004 - GLR Semi Finalist.
2003 - GLR/DTR Quarter Finalist & GLR/NAT'L Rookie All Star.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2007, 20:57
Justin M. Justin M. is offline
Mechanical/Driver
FRC #0321 (RoboLancers)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 310
Justin M. is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Justin M.
Re: Picking alliances

We didn't really sell as much as I would of hoped, so we didn't get picked unfortunatly. We would of made the top 8 if it wasn't for a few technicalities that lost us the game (SPOILERS!!!), the second day of seeding matches. We were one of the good, consistant, high scorers, but we had very little time to practice before ship, and the field team was a little shakey at the Philly Regional. If we had some more practice with the rack, we could of done some improvements beforehand instead of the practice day, which eventually led to missing more practice matches, etc.

All a learning experience, the best we can do now is prepare even more for next year. Hopefully we'll be attending the NJ regional as well as Philly and Nats, so we'll be an even stronger team than before - and maybe even become a finalist somewhere.
__________________
Team 321: CHS RoboLancers - Drexel University, CHS Alumni Assn., SDP, Philadelphia Motorsports, Lima Corperation
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-03-2007, 21:20
cire's Avatar
cire cire is offline
Alumni, Mentor, and Coach
AKA: Eric Diehr
FRC #1716 (Redbird Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: De Pere, WI
Posts: 183
cire is just really nicecire is just really nicecire is just really nicecire is just really nice
Send a message via MSN to cire
Re: Picking alliances

1015 was in a simular situation at GLR:

We were seeded 45th out of 59. We did try to "sell" our selfs to the top teams. We felt that we were a lot better then our seeding rank. Based on 1504's scouting data we were the 8th best tube scorer (total of 18 in 8 matchs). We had some bad luck with partners and so on. It seemed like nobody really noticed us though, and we got picked 15th (by the 2nd alliance on the 2nd time arround!). Our scouters had talked with the 2nd alliance before, which may or may not have helped them pick us. Our alliance managed to win the competition! I think this was partialy because nobody noticed we were such a good tube scorer, and the 2nd alliance got to pick a reliable bot for a 3rd partner to make a good alliance.

Anyways, I think that you should sell yourself if you have a great robot. Not all teams have great scouting data like 1504. I know last year we made it to the eliminations for the first time ever after 4 years. We were not prepared to pick partners and ended up not knowing who to pick really. So yes, teams dont know who to pick, and just letting them know who you are doesnt hurt anything. Just as long as you dont do it in the wrong way I dont think it is "desperate".
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-03-2007, 23:31
LightWaves1636's Avatar
LightWaves1636 LightWaves1636 is offline
is all over it.
AKA: Sarah Le
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 603
LightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to LightWaves1636 Send a message via Yahoo to LightWaves1636
Re: Picking alliances

Quote:
Originally Posted by geowasp View Post
Ok, so team 1552 did not get selected into eliminations, either
a) they were not a good robot
b) they are ranked 40 out of 45
c) they are a good robot, but failed to exemplify their abilities in the round robin rounds, for whatever reason (new non-random alliance partner selections, etc. )

should they have attempted to "sell" themselves to the higher seeds, if they think the rankings do not reflect their actual ability, or should they simply wait and see, hoping that scouting by other teams would've noticed them? Does it seem desperate if a lowly ranked team attempts to make a final effort to convince potential alliance captains to pick them? In ideal conditions, rankings should reflect a team's ability, but we all know in around 10 matches, some unexpected teams can happen, and a good robot worthy of going into eliminations can easily end up with a losing record, and in the bottom of the rankings. So, my question to the FIRST community out there is: what would you do to get your team into eliminations if you know your team has a great robot, but your rankings are absolutely abyssmal come alliance selections?
I thought you guys had a nice looking bot but 40? eesh, but I wasn't able to watch any matches because I stayed in the pit keeping it tidy and doing repeat ability tests on our robot. AND NO, it does not seem desperate when a low ranked team makes attempts in smooching up to other teams as a final attempt. As long as the teams got good scouts, than they'll know exactly which teams to pick for alliance and not just base it off of rank or else team 1 would pick team 2, team 3 picks team 4 and so on and so forth and teams like us wold have never gotten chosen. But then again if a team didn't show a good performance in the prelims, it's very hard to say "we want them". We dropped from 1st to 18th in three matches, we were dominating the entire morning up until everyone started pinning us and our alliances wouldn't help us and try to score it themselves but everyone knew we had a mean bot because of how well we performed in the majority of our matches. Plus 1583 was able to get 555 to chose us because we were one of the very few bots who had the clearance to get up. But for the question, I would most defiantly have the entire team be talking to the top 8 teams constantly. didn't work for us at 18th though for most of the other teams but as long as someone wanted 1583 we were good.
__________________
FLL Team - Hackberry Hill Elementary - Arvada, CO ('08 - '10 Coach)
FRC Team 1636 - Reds Robotics - Arvada High School - Arvada, CO ('05 - '07 Alumni)
FRC Team 1583 - Rambotics - Ridgeview Academy - Watkins, CO (Volunteer/Supporter)
FRC Team 2859 - Blasterbots - CSM Robotics Outreach - Golden, CO ('09 - '10 Coach)
FRC Team 3320 - Miracles & Machines - Eastside Memorial High School - Austin, TX ('10 - '12 Mentor)
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-03-2007, 23:44
Jared W's Avatar
Jared W Jared W is offline
Registered User
FTC #3228 (S.P.A.M. FRC #180)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Martin County
Posts: 65
Jared W is just really niceJared W is just really niceJared W is just really niceJared W is just really niceJared W is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Jared W
Re: Picking alliances

In the Florida Regional, SPAM Team 180 (us) picked Team 233 Pink and they were last seed. They were just unlucky and were paired with the wrong teams. We were 6th seed, and ended up losing in the Semi-finals...all 3 games. Pink exemiplified their great arm potential, and it showed in their scoring, not in their ranking. We wouldn't have been able to scout so well if it hadn't had been for our 30+ kids in the stands =).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
declining alliances geowasp General Forum 6 27-03-2006 18:13
[OCCRA]: Top Ranking Teams Picking Alliances Lisa Perez OCCRA Q&A 1 15-11-2004 20:31
alliances archiver 1999 49 23-06-2002 22:43
Tri-Alliances? archiver 1999 6 23-06-2002 22:16
3 Team Alliances archiver 1999 5 23-06-2002 22:13


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi