|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Read the 1st post. | |||
| 39 |
|
6 | 3.55% |
| 67 |
|
9 | 5.33% |
| 79 |
|
7 | 4.14% |
| 233 |
|
23 | 13.61% |
| 340 |
|
13 | 7.69% |
| 375 |
|
13 | 7.69% |
| 386 |
|
5 | 2.96% |
| 910 |
|
5 | 2.96% |
| 1114 |
|
25 | 14.79% |
| 1902 |
|
57 | 33.73% |
| 1730 |
|
6 | 3.55% |
| Voters: 169. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
We really didn't want to change much since we were doing so well in all other respects. In hind sight, the reward may have outweighed the risk. Our system consisted of 4 ultra-sonic sensors. One low on the robot, aimed to detect the base of the rack. 3 right below our gripper to detect the foot. The basic program for auto mode went like this: deploy the gripper/tube start to move the tube to scoring height start moving forward - timed - this lets us ignore our lower sensor while it calibrated and prevented false readings in case it saw the gripper deploy. using the lower sensor - drive to within scoring distance of the rack using the upper sensor pod, center the robot on the nearest spider foot robot turns right/left to seek the foot If foot found, lower gripper - release tube - wait for auto to end else release tube regardless at 14.5 seconds The upper sensors were read by a custom curcuit which fed back 2 bits of target data to the RC. The data that came back represented the possible foot locations from the sensor pod's point of view: Center Right Left Unknown The original plan was to have more info go back to the RC but our first cut at the communications did not work and we ran out of time. Last edited by ericand : 23-04-2007 at 12:15. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
i vote 1126
as well, why are they not on the list they were consistentLast edited by Sislith : 22-06-2007 at 13:35. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
i think that we hit on like 85% to 90% throughout the whole year(maybe a little high but im just guessing) but ne who ![]() |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
I put my voice in for 1902, the accuracy on that hog was outstanding. I would also like to give my honorable mention to 386 with the "cool" factor. Many teams have Easy Buttons in their driver station, but not many teams have a functional Easy Button on their robot that they use as a sensor for autonomous mode.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
I would also have chosen Team 67 they had an awesome autonomous, although they might have not been one of the fastest in scoring, they were reliable and usually mixed it up between the middle and lower spider to keep the defending teams in autonomous guessing where they would score.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
Lynn (D) - Team Voltage 386 |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
I am putting together a video of all the various bots auto modes. See the thread below:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=57184 I already have collected myself 33,39, 79. 116, 340, 341, 386. 424. 1629, 1730, 1902 which came out of this discussion. Go to the thread and add your URL to your video to be added to the video we are making. Please read the rules. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
1902 dropped theirs every other time I saw them in Vegas and Atlanta. 39 hit their autonomous every single time I saw them in Vegas and Atlanta. I didn't really pay attention to the others. I admit that I'm only judging on accuracy, because in the end unless you can score twice in autonomous or have something extremely valuable to do afterwards, speed & coolness don't matter so long as scoring happens.
340 comes in a close 2nd due to their auto-code's correction after they were "defended" against in Atlanta. That showed true camera calibration and state control, something that's hard to master without several run-time iterations of obscure scenarios. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
I have been working on a video of the autnomous robots. Here is a post on an update:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...854#post633854 |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
I have the first rough pass at the autnomous video. Go to this thread for the url and discussion on the video.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...082#post634082 Once we get the final I will post for all of CD. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2006 game poll #10 (team prediction before kickoff) | dhitchco | Rumor Mill | 0 | 18-11-2005 12:17 |
| Forethought: A Must-Read Before Posting | Rich Kressly | General Forum | 11 | 06-01-2005 09:10 |
| vB3 is here. READ THIS BEFORE ASKING QUESTIONS! | Brandon Martus | Announcements | 3 | 01-12-2003 21:27 |
| PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE NATIONALS | archiver | 2001 | 0 | 24-06-2002 02:57 |
| more time before forums are marked as read | mike o'leary | CD Forum Support | 3 | 29-07-2001 05:34 |