|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Game deciding strategy | |||
| paired goals in your quadrant |
|
21 | 70.00% |
| side goals |
|
5 | 16.67% |
| single goals |
|
4 | 13.33% |
| Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
[FTC]: Game deciding strategies
At the competitions youve been to what was the game deciding strategy that won the most matches
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Game deciding strategies
I accidentally clicked the wrong poll vote, but one of the more innovative and successful strategies I saw was a team latching onto a single goal and then driving in the other direction scooping up rings and dropping them on as they went.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Game deciding strategies
Though i havn't seen much of it, when a robot scored at least three rings on the high post, they almost always won the game.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Game deciding strategies
i was thinking the paired goals would play a big part
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Game deciding strategies
i forgot to put the 24 inch goals on the poll
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Game deciding strategies
Out of all of the videos, etc. That i have seen, scoring was a capability only enjoyed by a few robots. Most of the robots were fighting over the goals and trying to get the points for afterwards.
My thought is that if you can get at least 5 rings up on the 24 inch poles and then at least have one goal in your quadrant then you should have the win. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Game deciding strategies
We found that the goals played a huge part in deciding the matches. Our final match, which would have won us the competition, was lost by one goal that moved out of our quadrant when the crossbar pulled out of its paired goal. Those 14 points make a huge difference.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Game deciding strategies
Yeah. Although the game this year is really involved, i wish that the game relied more on one's ability to score the actual game pieces rather than bickering over goals the entire match. But, HEY. I'm not complaining. It's a fun game...just hope to see some of you there...
btw...who's coming to the GA regional here... |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Game deciding strategies
Now that the game is geting more and more developped (player wise). There is more and more scoring with rings.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: Game deciding strategies
That's always expected, sort of weeding out scorers from non scorers. Hope everyone gets a lot of practice driving and playing around. Anyone coming to the NJ comp. at TCNJ?
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Game deciding strategies
Quote:
As for what I've seen... at the Diamond State Tech Challenge, I saw a lot of battles over the paired goal. Once the single goals were in, there wasn't as much of a battle for possession |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Game deciding strategies
At Chicago, generally if you could get atleast 2 goals in your zone, you won the game. If you could do it in Auton you could pretty much guarantee the match. Another thing that was an amazing help with posessing goals was a grabbing mechanism which could pull the goals off of the wall or out of the corner. Our gripper originally was designed to grab the goal around the base, but we found it was much easier to control the goals if we bent the ends of our gripper so it had a hook on each end. These hooks could grab one goal fron pretty much anywhere, or even grab two goals and drag them with the robot.
Malhon |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FTC]: [FTC]: Ontario Provincial FTC Start/End Times | cbhl | FIRST Tech Challenge | 8 | 16-12-2007 13:37 |
| [FTC]: 2007 FTC Game Hint Released | skimoose | FIRST Tech Challenge | 37 | 23-10-2007 00:01 |
| //FIRST// FTC 2007 Game Challenge Revealed - Quad Quandary! | Mark McLeod | FIRST Tech Challenge | 3 | 23-09-2007 16:01 |
| FTC Game Hint Announced | Brandon Martus | Announcements | 0 | 12-09-2007 10:04 |
| Deciding factor | edomus | General Forum | 0 | 06-03-2004 23:18 |