|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Bumper Rule
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Bumper Rule
To answer your original question - yes, there can be gaps as long as you cover 2/3 of the perimeter, and no bumper segment can be less than 6" long.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bumper Rule
Specifically, the rule states that a STANDARD bumper as defined in Fig. 8-1 must be no shorter than 6 inches. Since they also do not want "hard" bumpers in the corners, you must place a vertical pool noodle to soften the corners of the side or front bumpers such that it covers the corner.
The extra vertical pool noodle that isn't part of the STANDARD bumper cannot count toward the minimum 6 inches. Though it is unfortunate, this is the only interpretation of this rule I can come up with. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bumper Rule
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Bumper Rule
Quote:
Figure 8-2 on page 10 of THE ROBOT shows exactly the scenario I am describing in the top left corner of the view of the robot on the left. Quote:
Quote:
I'll try and get a good picture of what we have done and has been accepted in the past with these rules (which have not changed much, if any over the years of bumpers - other than the REQUIREMENT to have them this year as opposed to previous years. Last edited by Elgin Clock : 11-01-2008 at 12:04. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Bumper Rule
Quote:
The note in Figure 8.2 says, "if needed, a pool noodle corner can be wrapped into bumpers - bou only pool noodle and cloth may penetrate the corner space" |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bumper Rule
Yea my bad. The point of the post was to clarify that the vertical pool noodle isn't part of a standard bumper by definition, therefore the vertical pool noodle should not be used in the 6" minimum dimension. I've thought about this several times due to the fact that our team this year is going with an open-front design and due to the nature of the bumper rules we unfortunately cannot have bumpers on the front, at all.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Bumper Rule
Heres a quick question:
What if one were to put bumpers on their robot in such a way that they fit all regulations and made contact within the bumper zone, but also extended below the 2.5" mark?? |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Bumper Rule
If it was below 2.5" it would not fit regulations.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Bumper rule interpretation - straight from the lead inspector | Gary Dillard | Rules/Strategy | 17 | 12-03-2007 14:56 |
| bumper | coolguybigt | Technical Discussion | 4 | 27-02-2007 16:40 |
| Bumper or No? | WebWader125 | Technical Discussion | 19 | 11-01-2006 01:28 |
| Rule G11 and Springs Rule | mtaman02 | Technical Discussion | 3 | 23-01-2004 17:43 |
| Bumper Rule <R17> | Veselin Kolev | Rules/Strategy | 10 | 23-01-2004 09:58 |