|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
CIM Drive Train motors
Has anybody ever compared 2 v 4 CIM moters for the drive train and how much power you lose?
Thanks MAtt 894 |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CIM Drive Train motors
You lose half of the power by having half as many motors.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CIM Drive Train motors
What about speed?
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CIM Drive Train motors
Speed will go up slightly, because you are decreasing the amount of speed lost due to friction. It will NOT double.
Torque will double though so if you want twice the speed, then gear it up more. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CIM Drive Train motors
Maximum top speed you can get should be higher with two motors, since you have twice the power available, but teams usually set up the gearing to limit top speed. There are several reasons for this, including being able to control the robot, and having enough pushing power at low speeds (which you lose when you gear the robot to go faster). A good compromise might be to have a two speed transmission, so you can have good pushing power and still have the robot geared for a fast top speed.
Getting up to top speed will be faster (quicker acceleration) with 4 motors. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CIM Drive Train motors
JVN has an excel(lent) speed modeler in this white paper. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/1676
With it you can change the motor inputs, gearing, weight, etc. and it will generate displacement, velocity, acceleration, and current plots. He removed it from his recent update, so you'll have to go old school and get the old one. Ken Patton has a similar spreadsheet, but I don't have a location to direct people to. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CIM Drive Train motors
Ok thanks for the input. In previous years we are all about power and defense. This year we think its more about speed and the reason for not using 4 drive train CIM's is we think we are going to use one some where else.
Thanks for the help! |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CIM Drive Train motors
Quote:
Food for thought. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CIM Drive Train motors
Quote:
our 2006 robot had 1 CIM on each side and they hauled all 120lbs around and after 2 minutes you could tell the battery was getting low.... plus with the other attachments on there the battery drained very fast. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CIM Drive Train motors
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| your thoughts on the FP CIM/2.5 CIM motor drive setup versus 2 2.5 CIM motors | waialua359 | Motors | 11 | 14-12-2007 04:29 |
| Motors on drive train | Zoheb N | Motors | 3 | 16-01-2007 12:25 |
| drive train | Adama | Technical Discussion | 30 | 14-12-2006 20:56 |
| pic: Jester Drive:Mecanum Wheel Drive Train | Ken Delaney 357 | Technical Discussion | 64 | 29-03-2006 22:16 |
| "Motors and Drive train edition" of Fresh From the Forum | Ken Leung | CD Forum Support | 6 | 29-01-2002 12:32 |