|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
pic: 1726 week 4
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
Very cool looking, I like the chain system on it.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
You beat us on the chassis weight, we were 70-75!
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
Why not use two idlers rather than the curved plastic? It'd be a lot more efficient.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
The green plastic is our tensioner. The hole is off center, so we just loosen it and rotate it to tension the chain.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
I'm curious how we'd calculate the efficiency of it either way...any ideas?
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
The curved plastic is UHMW Polyethylene chain guide from McMaster. It is very light and has very little friction on the chain. Using idlers would have placed the top length of the chain a lot higher up from the frame, and would have been very difficult to mount.
Last edited by GUI : 03-02-2008 at 23:31. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
I'd say the efficiency loss due to friction on the plastic is minimal and worth the benefit of not having to make very precise holes for idlers. As a general team moto the less machining the better.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
Why the AL frame. You're using poltrusion below. Why not continue with the uper frame?
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
The Al is for mounting the mechanism on it--it save weight (lots) and is easier to machine than pultrusion. Pultrusion must also be thicker to achieve the same strength as aluminum so it would be unwieldy to mount that way.
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
or, the short answer: we had the pultruded fiberglass channel for the frame already, but no thin angle, so we went with aluminum. Also the aluminum is available at Ace hardware, and easy to replace if it we have problems with it in competition.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
our bot is so cool
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
I'm sure the rest of the team is proud of it too, Stan.
![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
Is the tensioner an off the shelf item or machined from a piece of round stock? If it is off the shelf where did you get it? If not what material is it, HMWPE or Nylon? We are looking for a new/easier tensioning system and we have been leaning toward the off-center circle. I would also like to know what materials work best for this method.
Thanks, Amir |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1726 week 4
We made the green tensioners with oil impregnated nylon rod (2" diameter), turned on the lathe.
The white material (UHMW Polyethylene) that the chain guide is made of would work well too, I suppose...we had the nylon rod left over from last year, so we made the tensioners with it. Also we added an internal/external tooth lockwasher between the tensioner and frame rail to make sure it would not slip. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 1726 Promobot | GUI | Extra Discussion | 18 | 01-11-2007 18:04 |
| pic: 1726 NURC ROV | s_forbes | Extra Discussion | 11 | 13-06-2007 23:54 |
| pic: 1726 2007 OI | TheOtherGuy | Extra Discussion | 2 | 11-02-2007 23:17 |
| pic: 1726 Unfinished Parts | MrForbes | Extra Discussion | 6 | 26-01-2007 00:14 |
| pic: Real Pic of Team 1726 MegaMaid Progress | yodameister | Extra Discussion | 4 | 12-02-2006 13:23 |