|
Intentionally Losing Matches
I have been thinking of this for a while, and I want to see the chiefdelphi perspective of this.
Consider this case:
Your team has a decent lapbot in a shallow field, and one qualification match left to compete in. If you win the next match, you are guarenteed to be the 8th alliance captain, but you would be facing a superalliance of 1114, 217, xxxx (clearly an exageration), which you could never beat no-matter who you selected.
If you were to intentionally forfeit the next qualification match by not showing up and not sending a representative from your team, you would be definitely outside of the alliance captain selections, and would likely be selected by the number 1 or 2 or 3 alliance (2nd pick) making it to the finals or possibly winning.
Do you think it is un-gp to not show up for a match intentionally and possibly affect your alliance at that qualification match. Note, this is different from coming onto the field and losing by driving clockwise the entire match.
DISCLAIMER: I in no way support this strategy. Please don't misinterpret this post as intent to use this strategy myself or for my team. This has not been done by any team I know, and is purely hypothetical.
__________________
In 2006
Team Name: 3652 FLAME
Michigan VEX Competition WINNERS
Pennsylvania VEX Competition WINNERS
Atlanta World Championships Runner-up alliance
Only team to win two regionals in 2006
In 2007
Team Name: 478 Mustang Robotics and 163 UHS Robotics
Events:
Toronto FTC Competition - Finalists (478, 163, 298)
MA FTC Competition - Winners! (738, 478, 427)
Last edited by fredliu168 : 04-07-2008 at 12:03 AM.
|