|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: This was definitely 1114s year.
Quote:
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: This was definitely 1114s year.
It was nothing more than 1114's gripper becoming slightly out of line due to a technical issue. Their shooter is fixed to a constant position, so if the claw isn't oriented properly it was shoot improperly, and the trackballs were actually being shot into part of the gripper (thus why they didn't go very far). I was very impressed how quickly 1114 identified and diagnosed this problem, and how fast they managed to fix it. As a whole, that alliance survived more problems and technical issues than any I can remember. Most alliances when they undergo that much trouble eventually lose, but they kept fixing them and lasted until that all important tenth elimination win.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: This was definitely 1114s year.
Unfortunatley, it's unlikely I'll get to see 1114 in person and get to ask you guys - so here goes:
Out of curiosity, can somebody on 1114 clue us in on what type of sensors you were using for your autonomous? Probably encoders and gyro - but were were the sensors on each side of your mast just on top of your guarding? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: This was definitely 1114s year.
Their mentor told me they use quadrature encoders on the output shafts for the drive wheels, and a 300 degree-per-second gyro (Digikey ADXRS300EB-ND). Using these, they keep track of their position of the field, and control the heading of the turn once they reach each position. Their hybrid controllers selected which lane(s) to be in.
Great ideas - accompanied by awesome implementation all around. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: This was definitely 1114s year.
There are few teams as professional, proud, and prepared as the Simbotics. Since their inception they have demonstrated excellence in every of their endeavors. They are not afraid to succeed, nor are they unwilling to show others how to do the same. They have driven myself and my teammates to be both a better team and better people through their demonstration of their efforts.
We're happy to have run with you guys this year, during a time when you so rightfully deserved a Championship win. In my mind, you remain one of the extremely few teams in FIRST for everyone to aspire to be. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: This was definitely 1114s year.
Awesome performance by the entire 1114 crew to make this happen.
This depth of performance shows a great design, great fabrication, great strategy and great implementation. Focus on details absolutely paid off. Congratulations on a great season and great alliance selections. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This was definitely 1114s year.
No need to drag Karthik or anyone out here, I can answer this as I spent a good amount of time admiring the machine in question. The protected sensors on the top of their shielding on either side of the mast were their IR boards, the very same that were shipped to all teams, one oriented facing in each direction.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This was definitely 1114s year.
Man, I'm really disappointed I didn't get to see you guys on Einstein. My team had to leave for the airport
. Does anyone know when they'll be posting the matches online? Can't wait to see our own and the ones I missed. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This was definitely 1114s year.
Yes, their bot was great, their drivers fantastic. . . But what was best was their approach to their alliance partners. As a rookie team with only 8 members able to travel to Atlanta we were a bit streatched. We were thrilled when we saw in our second match we had 1114 on our alliance. As usual our drive team was talking to partners when 1114 sent its first scout team member. the usual questions were asked and we gave our best honest answers that we could. Nothing strange here.
When the drive teams finally got together to discuss the match three things became clear. 1) They were good. 2) they knew it, not in a jerk way but a confident way and 3) they wanted to HELP all alliance partners contribute to the match. After seeing some powerhouse teams "park" lesser capable alliance partners this was extra special Congrats to 1114 for the champiohship and thank you for all the alliance partners that you helped to let them contribute to your success Last edited by Lancer Robotics : 24-04-2008 at 15:20. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This was definitely 1114s year.
1114 is the real thing. We've worked with them on many occasions, and I was so happy when they won. On and off the field, they are always a high-quality team who does things right. These guys are a team to be looked to for an example. Congratulations on capping off an incredible year with a well-deserved win!
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: This was definitely 1114s year.
I want to echo everything that everyone else is saying. A well-deserved win.
We were lucky enough to sit behind 1114 on Galileo throughout the CMP. This means our parents and mentors and student stood with them AT the door to get in and get those good seats... They were at the door hours before anyone else.... Their team is a class act from top to bottom. I think that the most interesting thing is that they really didn't know how good they were.... or at least they certainly did not act like it... Congratulations to 1114 and to the TChickens and RWranglers... A great alliance and a great championship.... thanks for a great year and for a new mark for everyone to shoot for in quality ... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Was play this year too aggresive? | JVN | General Forum | 29 | 22-04-2004 13:31 |
| What was your best memory from this year/ever? | miketwalker | General Forum | 30 | 01-05-2003 13:24 |
| What was the most innovative feature this year? | archiver | 2001 | 15 | 24-06-2002 04:17 |
| What's easier? Last year or this year? | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 23-06-2002 23:33 |
| Last year vs. this year Fisher Price Gear | bmusser | Technical Discussion | 4 | 29-01-2002 13:24 |