|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
47 second delay
WOW. I am all tired out from reporting those spam messages. It would be easier to report if the reporting message was exempt for the 47 second posting cycle. Even I can type faster than that
.Have a great holiday to all the Chief Delphi Family. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
Similarly, waiting 47 seconds to let y'all know I've deleted the spam is sometimes cumbersome.
The delay does, of course, also limit how frequently spammers can post as well. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
Quote:
Personally I find the 47 second delay a great annoyance. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
What was that 5 spam messages reported in a row? Great job!
We should make it a contest, and count the number of reports each person can get. The person with the most is certifiably the biggest CD user. ![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
I noticed that this morning for the first time. (Reported my first spam message...) I guess it's good that I've never had time to report any other messages. Good job patrolling the interweb!
Anyway, I do think the 47 second delay is somewhat annoying, but in the end, necessary. It seems that spammers still manage to post a lot of stuff here. Still, you never know. Maybe some spammer would just go and flood the site with spam if the delay is removed... I mean, at least the spam is manageable now. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 47 second delay
If the reporting function did not count as a message, then it would be easier to report. That 47 seconds seems like a lifetime.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
The time delay is adjustable, but the shorter it is, the greater benefit to the spammers. I am the admin in another forum (unrelated to robots) and the only effective way to get rid of spammers was to moderate all new members manually; even then a spammer slips in now and again.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
Quote:
Just this one. For some reason they love coming here and posting their stuff. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
Quote:
Most of the spam I see is electronics for sale. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
When I report things, I normally post in the thread first, then click the report button.
I've never gotten a delay that way. But for reporting multiple messages.... |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
Movie and sports pages.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
It's typical for spammers to hit boards hard on the holidays. Less people on to deal with them, sometimes they time these things.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
Quote:
Rock on and Thank you! And you, too, Mad the Mod! Happy 4th! |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
Sounds to me like the report button functionality needs a little bit of reworking... like it disables after a single user hits it. That would make the moderators only get 1 email per problem, and would eliminate the need for a delay on the reporting system
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 47 second delay
The problem is, the report button is probably a standard part of the vBulletin package. To change how it works is probably more work than its worth for the amount of spam CD gets.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Delay | jasonpeinko | Programming | 8 | 18-01-2008 15:56 |
| Delay Help! | waiakea2024 | Programming | 7 | 21-02-2007 12:41 |
| NERDS Delay... | Andy Grady | General Forum | 21 | 14-03-2006 21:52 |
| CMUCam 3 second startup Delay? | Chris_Elston | Programming | 4 | 19-02-2006 09:33 |
| Delay | Gal Longin | Programming | 1 | 09-12-2004 10:37 |