|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC 1771 Drivetrain
Actually belts stretch much less than chain. In multiple posts by team 125 they talk about there belts not stretching at all after initially tensioning them. they rely on kevlar belt which is very strong stuff. The only positive I see to the chain is that it is easier to change if it breaks. In all other aspects, belt is the superior solution.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC 1771 Drivetrain
I forgot to post the gear ratios so here goes. The first stage is 12 to 48 reduction, and then the second stage is either a 15 to 60 or 30 to 45 reduction.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC 1771 Drivetrain
Other than needing to loose a few pounds, i would say it looks good. Keep up the good work.
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: FRC 1771 Swerve Module | sdcantrell56 | Extra Discussion | 17 | 13-04-2008 00:36 |
| pic: FRC 1771 Swerve | sdcantrell56 | Extra Discussion | 5 | 10-04-2008 16:17 |
| pic: 1771 drivetrain machining | sdcantrell56 | Extra Discussion | 3 | 15-02-2008 17:26 |
| pic: 1771 drivetrain complete 2 | sdcantrell56 | Extra Discussion | 4 | 12-01-2008 00:57 |
| pic: 2008 drivetrain 1771 | sdcantrell56 | Extra Discussion | 9 | 10-01-2008 11:55 |