|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
They seem to be working on it almost all day every day during the week. If you want to check up on them, it's pretty easy....although it's Sunday today.
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/falcon-robotics-team-842 |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
Where's the cRIO?
Quote:
Last edited by NickE : 11-01-2009 at 13:15. |
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
Quote:
That would settle the dispute...... Thanks for helping to vet us. We don't want to caught at a regional with a violation. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
It never explicitly says that it must be convex, but wrapping a string around a concave polygon will result with the string not following the entire perimeter of the polygon. If you wrap a string around this robot in the bumper zone, it will form a convex rectangle.
|
|
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
definition per rules
To determine the BUMPER PERIMETER, wrap a piece of string around the ROBOT at the level of the BUMPER ZONE - the string describes this polygon. We would have our string cross the opening of our bot. It does not say it has to make contact with the bumper zone everywhere. That is an assumption. Our polygon would be a rectangle, never the less we will cover the angles in from the corner with 6 inches of bumper. We think we are ok......I hope |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
Quote:
|
|
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
Quote:
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
Another team member pointed this out to me today: the first thing to contact a flat vertical obstacle (aka the wall) must be your bumper. If you have one side completely uncovered, then the first thing to hit that vertical obstacle will be metal.
|
|
#26
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
angled
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
Angled "bumpers" would not pass inspection because technically they are not bumpers at all since they do not lie on the bumper perimeter according to the current set of definitions and both sides of the corner must be protected.
|
|
#28
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
Ahhh...here's that statement that seemed to me to be missing from the rules.
"2. As indicated in Rule <R08-I>, all exterior corners of the BUMPER PERIMETER must be protected by BUMPERS. Both "sides" of the corner must be protected." from http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=11159 |
|
#29
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
Quote:
|
|
#30
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Carmen week1 team 842
The problem is the bumpers need to be on the bumper perimeter, which is the edge around the robot, and recessed parts of the frame are not the perimeter. So it looks to me like it's not legal. You'd have to put back the straight pieces across the front, but make them each 6" long, and cover them with 6" long bumpers. This will give a pretty small opening in the middle.
What a bummer, how vague the rules are this year on bumpers...they could have just come out and said what they wanted in the first place. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Robot-Week1 | Brad Voracek | Extra Discussion | 13 | 16-01-2009 11:44 |
| pic: Team 842 in Hispanic Magazine | falconmaster | Extra Discussion | 5 | 07-10-2008 19:28 |
| pic: 1889 Team HAZE's frame (week1) | Tytus Gerrish | Extra Discussion | 8 | 19-01-2007 02:23 |
| pic: installed battery team 842 | falconmaster | Robot Showcase | 11 | 04-02-2006 09:36 |
| pic: Turret team 842 | falconmaster | Robot Showcase | 3 | 01-02-2006 17:28 |