|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
bumper rule
Its a fact that at least 2/3 of the robot perimeter must be protected by bumpers. But is the space taken by the trailer hitch included in the perimeter of the robot that needs to be covered?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: bumper rule
1: please check other threads theres already a thread on this.
2: My interpretation NO http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=71381 Last edited by FRC1672 : 29-01-2009 at 17:10. Reason: add info |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: bumper rule
Quote:
The trailer hitch is NOT included in bumper coverage. It is in the remaining 1/3. http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=11224 Last edited by EricH : 29-01-2009 at 17:30. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: bumper rule
Ok, the way they responded was no, but their explanation was yes. I probably could give yet another opinion on the matter...but instead:
Erich could you reread the question they posed and explain. I think you misread it. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: bumper rule
Quote:
However, on further reading (I was in a hurry): The bumper hitch does not count against your volume or weight (<R11> as revised in Update #1), which I now believe is the question originally asked. However, it also does not count as bumper, so you need to allow for that as well. And, the answer is no either way, so does it really matter? And the real lesson here is that you need to read the most recent copy of the rules, as the rules do change from time to time as needed. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: bumper rule
The thing I was referring to was the fact that I the way I read the question, it asks if the opening counts as part of the bumper perimeter. And yes it does. Thus you must count this as part of the 1/3 that is open. I might be reading too much into this, but that is the way I read the question.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: bumper rule
Quote:
The full, correct answer: See <R18-D>. If the hitch must be mounted on the bumper perimeter, it follows that whatever it is legally mounted on is part of the perimeter, provided that the perimeter has been determined correctly. The hitch counts against the 1/3 unprotected length, but does not count against weight or volume constraints, though the hardware does. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: bumper rule
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Bumper Rule makes West Coast drive Illegal? | Alan Ing | Technical Discussion | 24 | 30-01-2009 10:16 |
| Regarding Rule<R08> part M(Bumper attatchment) | spacegy4 | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 21-01-2009 18:22 |
| Bumper Rule | Compnerd | Rules/Strategy | 24 | 19-01-2008 08:24 |
| New Bumper rule interpretation - straight from the lead inspector | Gary Dillard | Rules/Strategy | 17 | 12-03-2007 14:56 |
| Bumper Rule <R17> | Veselin Kolev | Rules/Strategy | 10 | 23-01-2004 09:58 |