Go to Post [Programming a swerve drive] It's really really simple, unless you actually do it. - Ether [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Should <G14> apply in the eliminations?
Yes, keep the game rules consistent. 45 44.55%
No, let teams play at their peak performance in the elims. 56 55.45%
Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 01:28
David Brinza's Avatar
David Brinza David Brinza is offline
Lead Mentor, Lead Robot Inspector
FRC #0980 (ThunderBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 1,378
David Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond repute
What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

Should the GDC consider eliminating <G14> in eliminations?

In the OKC regional, <G14> was applied to alliances four times in the elimination matches. That meant the offending alliances lost two supercells and an empty cell in their matches. In spite of three <G14> violations, the #1 alliance was able to win the event.

Here are some observations that lead me to believe that applying <G14> in elimination matches is just not good for the game:

1) In elimination matches, ranking scores no longer apply so there is other motivation to keep the score close other than <G14>.

2) In low scoring matches, trying to avoid <G14> can cost you a win if the opponents scores one or two super cells near the end of the match.

3) At OKC, I observed occasional significant upward and downward real-time score fluctuations. Accidental super cell tallies were apparently entered by the score keepers, which were corrected (sometimes after the match was completed).

4) In the elimination rounds, the objective is to win and margin of victory isn't a matter of GP, it's about effectiveness, skill and luck. Why should a team hold back at this point in the competition.

What happened in other regionals - did anyone lose trying to avoid a <G14> violation?
__________________
"There's never enough time to do it right, but always time to do it over."
2003 AZ: Semifinals, Motorola Quality; SoCal: Q-finals, Xerox Creativity; IRI: Q-finals
2004 AZ: Semifinals, GM Industrial Design; SoCal: Winners, Leadership in Controls; Championship: Galileo #2 seed, Q-finals; IRI: Champions
2005 AZ: #1 Seed, Xerox Creativity; SoCal: Finalist, RadioShack Controls; SVR: Winners, Delphi "Driving Tomorrow's Technologies"; Championship: Archimedes Semifinals; IRI: Finalist
2007 LA: Finalist; San Diego: Q-finals; CalGames: Finalist || 2008 San Diego: Q-finals; LA: Winners; CalGames: Finalist || 2009 LA: Semifinals; Las Vegas: Q-finals; IRI: #1 Seed, Finalist
2010 AZ: Motorola Quality; LA: Finalist || 2011 SD: Q-finals; LA: Q-finals || 2013 LA: Xerox Creativity, WFFA, Dean's List Finalist || 2014 IE: Q-finals, LA: Finalist, Dean's List Finalist
2016 Ventura: Q-finals, WFFA, Engineering Inspiration
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 01:38
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,726
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

What I said, looking at the webcasts on Gameday, was something to the effect of: "We were all wrong."

We thought that <G14> wouldn't be an issue, mainly because SCs would be ignored, or because scores would be higher. We thought that teams would willingly take a <G14> to ensure a win.

After Week 1, we were shown wrong.

1114 scored on themselves to avoid it. They lost in QFs for other reasons, but I think a Super Cell helped after it was scored on one of their partners.

217, who said that they WANTED <G14> violations (at least, Paul Copioli did), used SCs quite a bit.

Super Cells were a huge factor in several events, and many matches. More teams lost because SCs were scored in the last few seconds than I care to remember.

<G14> is NOT a minor rule, like we thought it was. It will have a major effect, unless the later events step it up a notch or three.

Note: I was mainly watching Midwest and New Jersey, with a bit of DC elims.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk


Last edited by EricH : 01-03-2009 at 01:48.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 07:01
meaubry meaubry is offline
volunteer helper
FRC #6099 (Knights)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Shelby Twp, Mi
Posts: 780
meaubry has a reputation beyond reputemeaubry has a reputation beyond reputemeaubry has a reputation beyond reputemeaubry has a reputation beyond reputemeaubry has a reputation beyond reputemeaubry has a reputation beyond reputemeaubry has a reputation beyond reputemeaubry has a reputation beyond reputemeaubry has a reputation beyond reputemeaubry has a reputation beyond reputemeaubry has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

This is good discussion and everyone should share their opinions, BUT -
FIRST will NEVER change a rule that impacts the game this much, thus late into the competition season. (my opinion)
Thoughts -
As with most years, their are really 2 different strategies for winning between the seeding and the finals matches.
During the finals you cannot chance anything less than a 30 point lead, because if 2 supercells are scored against your alliance at the end of the game, it might swing the score enough to go from almost assured victory to a narrow defeat.
During seeding matches, it doesn't kill you if that happens because its not a win or go home situation, so you don't necessarily need to be overly worried - unless you know that the other teams just cannot score very many points, and even if they do win on a last second supercell luck shot so what, no big deal.
Just my 2 cents worth,
Mike Aubry
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 07:36
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,726
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

I agree with Mike, this rule should not be changed after some events have already played using it. They could drop it for Atlanta if they wanted, but probably wouldn't. I suspect this one will be top of the hit list at IRI.

But NOBODY knows how <G14> works, especially in elims. A very respected and knowledgeable colleague of Mike and I, also working at the event, came up to me and asked about it. His exact words, "I'm just asking, because I don't know." My wife who was a queuer was told by one of the kids that his mom said it didn't apply in finals - well, there's a good source of info for you.

We had > TRIPLE scores in QF 1-1 and QF 4-1 at Traverse City. When the <G14> was applied to their next matches, that left the alliance with zero super cells and two practically useless empty cells. When the guy at the outpost exhausted all his ammo in auto, he had nothing left to do but lean back in that comfy chair and watch the rest of the match. In both cases, the alliances advanced to the SF anyway. One of them carried a > Double Score <G14> into the first SF match.
__________________
(since 2004)
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 07:46
sgreco's Avatar
sgreco sgreco is offline
Registered User
AKA: Steven Greco
FRC #2079
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Millis
Posts: 1,031
sgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryVoshol View Post
I agree with Mike, this rule should not be changed after some events have already played using it. They could drop it for Atlanta if they wanted, but probably wouldn't. I suspect this one will be top of the hit list at IRI.

But NOBODY knows how <G14> works, especially in elims. A very respected and knowledgeable colleague of Mike and I, also working at the event, came up to me and asked about it. His exact words, "I'm just asking, because I don't know." My wife who was a queuer was told by one of the kids that his mom said it didn't apply in finals - well, there's a good source of info for you.

We had > TRIPLE scores in QF 1-1 and QF 4-1 at Traverse City. When the <G14> was applied to their next matches, that left the alliance with zero super cells and two practically useless empty cells. When the guy at the outpost exhausted all his ammo in auto, he had nothing left to do but lean back in that comfy chair and watch the rest of the match. In both cases, the alliances advanced to the SF anyway. One of them carried a > Double Score <G14> into the first SF match.
I agree that the rule shouldn't be changed.

Personally I don't like the rule that much, but their not going to change it.(and having played one week it wouldn't be fair to change it. I watched most of the weekend on gameday, but I wasn't actually at a competition.At the beginning my team decided that our strategy would be to ignore the rule as far the current match was concerned and accept the penalty. We figured that if we blow out a team x3 we wouldn't need our super cells. Now we are thinking differently since we saw the game played. But anyway this adds another dimension to the game, since it probably isn't going anywhere it'll be fun to play and use the rule as part of your strategy.

Last edited by sgreco : 01-03-2009 at 07:48.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 12:47
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,795
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

I dislike G14 no matter when it is applied, but if it's going to be applied in the elims I'd have made all G14 violations reset at the end of each round of the elims.

ie: you beat the tar out of your opponent 150-40 in QF1-3. You do not get penalized for SF1-1.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 12:52
David Brinza's Avatar
David Brinza David Brinza is offline
Lead Mentor, Lead Robot Inspector
FRC #0980 (ThunderBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 1,378
David Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory View Post
I dislike G14 no matter when it is applied, but if it's going to be applied in the elims I'd have made all G14 violations reset at the end of each round of the elims.

ie: you beat the tar out of your opponent 150-40 in QF1-3. You do not get penalized for SF1-1.
FIRST Q&A says the ONLY matches where <G14> cannot be applied are the first match and the surrogate match. The <G14> cell modification rule even extends from qualification into the elimination matches!
__________________
"There's never enough time to do it right, but always time to do it over."
2003 AZ: Semifinals, Motorola Quality; SoCal: Q-finals, Xerox Creativity; IRI: Q-finals
2004 AZ: Semifinals, GM Industrial Design; SoCal: Winners, Leadership in Controls; Championship: Galileo #2 seed, Q-finals; IRI: Champions
2005 AZ: #1 Seed, Xerox Creativity; SoCal: Finalist, RadioShack Controls; SVR: Winners, Delphi "Driving Tomorrow's Technologies"; Championship: Archimedes Semifinals; IRI: Finalist
2007 LA: Finalist; San Diego: Q-finals; CalGames: Finalist || 2008 San Diego: Q-finals; LA: Winners; CalGames: Finalist || 2009 LA: Semifinals; Las Vegas: Q-finals; IRI: #1 Seed, Finalist
2010 AZ: Motorola Quality; LA: Finalist || 2011 SD: Q-finals; LA: Q-finals || 2013 LA: Xerox Creativity, WFFA, Dean's List Finalist || 2014 IE: Q-finals, LA: Finalist, Dean's List Finalist
2016 Ventura: Q-finals, WFFA, Engineering Inspiration
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 12:57
Jeff Waegelin's Avatar
Jeff Waegelin Jeff Waegelin is offline
El Jefe de 148
AKA: Midwest Refugee
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,132
Jeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

We took the approach in eliminations (and in qualifiers, for that matter) that G14 didn't matter, and we wouldn't think about it. When you get to the eliminations, all that matters is wins and losses, and you don't have the time to think about trying to keep the score close. Just go out there and compete 100%, all the time. If you get a G14, it means you won, and that's what matters in an elimination series.
__________________
Jeff Waegelin
Mechanical Engineer, Innovation First Labs
Lead Engineer, Team 148 - The Robowranglers
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 13:08
thefro526's Avatar
thefro526 thefro526 is offline
Mentor for Hire.
AKA: Dustin Benedict
no team (EWCP, MAR, FRC 708)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,599
thefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to thefro526 Send a message via MSN to thefro526
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

We received one G14 in New Jersey. In qualifying match #31 we were ahead by about 40 points and our HP scored 2 Super Cells and sank them both. Our HP lost both of the Super Cells for the next match. We still won.

In qualification matches G14 doesn't really matter. For the most part, in the next match they only punish the offending team and even then I only know of one team (ours) that score 2 Super Cells in the Same Match with The Same HP.

In Elims it CAN be a killer if you triple. But that's only if you need Super Cells to win.
__________________
-Dustin Benedict
2005-2012 - Student & Mentor FRC 816
2012-2014 - Technical Mentor, 2014 Drive Coach FRC 341
Current - Mentor FRC 2729, FRC 708
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 13:11
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,795
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Brinza View Post
FIRST Q&A says the ONLY matches where <G14> cannot be applied are the first match and the surrogate match. The <G14> cell modification rule even extends from qualification into the elimination matches!
David, I know that. I just meant that if I had a say, that's what I'd do.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 16:36
excel2474's Avatar
excel2474 excel2474 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Aaron Stewart
FRC #2474 (Excel)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Niles, Michigan
Posts: 177
excel2474 is a jewel in the roughexcel2474 is a jewel in the roughexcel2474 is a jewel in the roughexcel2474 is a jewel in the rough
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

G14 is Socialism.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
1114 scored on themselves to avoid it. They lost in QFs for other reasons, but I think a Super Cell helped after it was scored on one of their partners..
This is a STUPID rule if it makes people score on themselves. If a team blows us out, I wouldn't care. Maybe it means we should step it up a notch.
__________________
"Find some thing you like to do and EXCEL at it with dilligence."

University of Notre Dame- Mechanical Engineering.
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2009, 16:46
David Brinza's Avatar
David Brinza David Brinza is offline
Lead Mentor, Lead Robot Inspector
FRC #0980 (ThunderBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 1,378
David Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

I'm guessing we won't see <G14> at IRI!
__________________
"There's never enough time to do it right, but always time to do it over."
2003 AZ: Semifinals, Motorola Quality; SoCal: Q-finals, Xerox Creativity; IRI: Q-finals
2004 AZ: Semifinals, GM Industrial Design; SoCal: Winners, Leadership in Controls; Championship: Galileo #2 seed, Q-finals; IRI: Champions
2005 AZ: #1 Seed, Xerox Creativity; SoCal: Finalist, RadioShack Controls; SVR: Winners, Delphi "Driving Tomorrow's Technologies"; Championship: Archimedes Semifinals; IRI: Finalist
2007 LA: Finalist; San Diego: Q-finals; CalGames: Finalist || 2008 San Diego: Q-finals; LA: Winners; CalGames: Finalist || 2009 LA: Semifinals; Las Vegas: Q-finals; IRI: #1 Seed, Finalist
2010 AZ: Motorola Quality; LA: Finalist || 2011 SD: Q-finals; LA: Q-finals || 2013 LA: Xerox Creativity, WFFA, Dean's List Finalist || 2014 IE: Q-finals, LA: Finalist, Dean's List Finalist
2016 Ventura: Q-finals, WFFA, Engineering Inspiration
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-03-2009, 01:24
bduddy bduddy is offline
Registered User
FRC #0840 (ART)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 867
bduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

I'm against it in every match, so there you go. And there's no reason it couldn't be changed-I highly doubt any teams based their robot design or strategy on it (and if they did, that would be truly sad).
__________________

Does anyone else remember when TBA signatures actually worked?
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-03-2009, 01:34
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,494
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Waegelin View Post
We took the approach in eliminations (and in qualifiers, for that matter) that G14 didn't matter, and we wouldn't think about it. When you get to the eliminations, all that matters is wins and losses, and you don't have the time to think about trying to keep the score close. Just go out there and compete 100%, all the time. If you get a G14, it means you won, and that's what matters in an elimination series.
I agree.

Just play it one match at a time, the goal is always to win that match.
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-03-2009, 03:53
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,726
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What do you think about <G14> in eliminations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bduddy View Post
I'm against it in every match, so there you go. And there's no reason it couldn't be changed-I highly doubt any teams based their robot design or strategy on it (and if they did, that would be truly sad).
Think about it. All the Week 1 teams played under one set of rules. If you remove a rule that hurts teams (or add one that hurts teams), you WILL get the Week 1 teams OR the non-Week 1 teams "screaming" at you that you're unfair, biased, that everyone should play under the same rules, the other group has it easier, etc., etc. And there's a fair chance that half the other group will join in to complain with the complainers.

Do you really want that? Do you think the GDC really wants that?
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
<G14> during eliminations Bob Steele Rules/Strategy 31 21-01-2009 18:50
Poll:What do you think the effect of G14 will be? Bongle Rules/Strategy 19 17-01-2009 08:45
What do you think about openFIRST? blueWarrior FIRST-related Organizations 6 28-09-2003 17:31
What do YOU think about making agreements? punarhero General Forum 11 18-03-2003 19:56
What do you think about NEXT YEAR's GAME? Digo General Forum 20 17-04-2002 14:09


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi