|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would have to say team 2825 (WAVE ROBOTICS) has an awesome robot hands down! and team 1714 (MORE ROBOTICS) are great too!
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Its 2826 not 2825 just to let you know...
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Quote:
![]() I was just visiting here to talk about Wave, as they were so awesome at 10,000 Lakes I thought they deserved a mention. Basically Wave was to 10,000 Lakes as Winnovation was to Wisconsin: A monster. Their crab drive really helps them a lot, as unlike Winnovation I didn't see them get pinned at all. They could pretty much do everything better than most of the robots there; scoring, defense, emptycell... Needless to say when they picked us first I was pretty happy. Rookie bot of the year, and a threat to look out for at Worlds. I'll say a little bit about our bot since it's been mentioned in the thread (I wouldn't say it's a "top bot" especially with the little I've seen outside of here, and I don't like tooting my own horn very much). Basically our robot's designed to work as a shooter or a turreted faux-dumper; since we can feed balls quickly we can get out 6 balls in about a second and 9 in two. Our ball pickup mechanism doesn't jam very easily (i've never seen it stuck for more than a second or so) and we're just wide enough so we can run along the wall to pick up Orbit balls, so we have an easier time feeding than some. As most teams have discovered short range / high speed shooting is really the way to go this year so we don't even usually try to go long range; we can use the dial on the joystick to adjust range for the occasional shot though. We did better because we fixed the drive code issues we had all through Wisconsin. I'm going to talk to programming about a new autonomous mode at our next meeting, that was what cost us the 1st semifinal elimination match. Last edited by Chris is me : 06-04-2009 at 15:09. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Anybody looking at rookie team 2970 ebots???? I belive where one of the many top bots this year. Of course im going to go with 1625 is up there. I havent seen any shooters that actually worked nicely. I want to see one.
-#2970-Tim |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
what about 2970?? have you seen us in action? 2nd in wisconsin and won minneapolis. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Quote:
You guys were great at the North Star! Thanks for being with us! |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
1114 Simbotics .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .....
............................... I LOST THE GAME!!!!!!!!!! ![]() |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
I'll let you know on Saturday the 18th.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Top bots simply can not be mentioned yet, because a lot of teams have yet to play.
I'd keep an eye on some of the "late bloomers" this year playing this weekend for the 1st time. ![]() $0.02 |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
I have to agree with this, why so you think we picked you guys? You were awesome!!!
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
I'd choose Team 45... though 234 and Robohawks (can't remember the number) look tough too.this is from what i've seen at DC and VCU.
And the tornado bot looks great, but i've never seen a team hold more than ~10 balls at once, though many can. I'm not sure it that huge capacity is really needed, by the time you've picked up 30 balls the game is nearly over. our 25 hopper has never gone past half filled, and ive seen the same issue with other large capacity teams such as MOE and DOTM |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
I have to say 67, we were eliminated, but the sheer defensive draw, which they can still score effectively against makes the entire alliance better. We once held them for 25 seconds pinned, which was great i havent seen anyone able to do anything near that. i would compare them to 1114's bot last year, completely dominant.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Quote:
We appreciate all of the compliments, though. Our robot is good but, there are a number of other teams that are just as good: 1114, 1625, 254/968 (my favorite), 148, 71, 217, 45 Just to name a few that I have seen on video. I am sure there are many others that should be on the list. As for defensive....469 is the most dominant defensive machine we have run across so far. I am sure we will see more as the year progresses. Last edited by Adam Freeman : 26-03-2009 at 12:13. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
I'm saying team 67. but a couple teams could take them out like team 245,1,1918,70. if some how three of those teams were team up against 67 there alliance team. it would make a amazing match.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Top Ten Things NOT to do with the 2009 FRC Control System | Vince | FRC Control System | 9 | 16-12-2008 17:08 |
| Top 5 Bots per Division-Einstein Predictions | Corey Balint | Championship Event | 63 | 24-04-2006 20:19 |
| Top Ten Bots of 2000 | archiver | 2000 | 25 | 23-06-2002 23:09 |
| All these mouse bots gives me an evil idea- CAT BOTS! | Patrick Wang | General Forum | 2 | 09-03-2002 22:43 |
| FOR NJ BOTS | arctic warrior | Regional Competitions | 2 | 26-02-2002 14:40 |