|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
In the very early years, there were no team numbers, just names. Then for a few years teams got new numbers every year. Starting in 1998 permanent team numbers were assigned. Those already in the program were assigned alphabetically. Juggernauts became team #1 because their sponsor that year started with a number, and sorted lowest.
• Teams #1-#208 were rookies in or before 1998 (this is due to FIRST giving teams new numbers every year previously). • Teams #209-#335 were rookies in 1999. • Teams #336-#491 were rookies in 2000. • Teams #492-#716 were rookies in 2001. • Teams #717-#999 were rookies in 2002 • Teams #1000-#1238 were rookies in 2003. • Teams #1239-#1497 were rookies in 2004. • Teams #1498-#1709 were rookies in 2005. • Teams #1710-#1980 were rookies in 2006. • Teams #1981-#2287 were rookies in 2007. • Teams #2330-#2681 were rookies in 2008. • Teams #2702-#3122 were rookies in 2009 (no even numbers between 2702 and 2826). |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
I am very confused. I could just not be seeing the forest through the trees, but why did they skip all of those even numbers?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
Quote:
(i.e. 51 is a new team, but not a rookie because they consist of 47 and 65, so they received a 1998-era number) |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
51 is an oddly familiar number..
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
Since this 2-year-old thread was revived, let's update with current information:
• Teams #1-#208 were rookies in or before 1998 (this is due to FIRST giving teams new numbers every year previously). • Teams #209-#335 were rookies in 1999. • Teams #336-#491 were rookies in 2000. • Teams #492-#716 were rookies in 2001. • Teams #717-#999 were rookies in 2002. • Teams #1000-#1238 were rookies in 2003. • Teams #1239-#1497 were rookies in 2004. • Teams #1498-#1709 were rookies in 2005. • Teams #1710-#1980 were rookies in 2006. • Teams #1981-#2287 were rookies in 2007. • Teams #2330-#2681 were rookies in 2008. • Teams #2702-#3122 were rookies in 2009 (no even numbers between 2702 and 2826). • Teams #3123-3423 were rookies in 2010. • Teams #3450-3883 were rookies in 2011. And no, I have no idea why so many even numbers were skipped in 2009. That's a large number of spots for non-rookie new teams compared to other years. For example, this year they saved numbers 3424-3449 for non-rookie teams created in future years that would have 2010 rookie status. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
I think Chris is right about the skipping of the odd numbers. For example after the2009 season, Method 2 Madness split into two teams. Those teams are noe 2704 Order 2 Chaos and 2949 PWNAGE.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
Or everyone will beat me to it before I even post.
=p |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
Have numbers everbeen reused after the team officially retires
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
No number that was ever used by an active team and been inactive for three or more years has been reused to our database's knowledge.
Team's have sat out a year or three and still retained their old team number when they've returned. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
And another perennial question (that has to be on CD somewhere, but I can't find it) is, do we have the complete list of teams that have competed since the Great Renumbering of 1998?
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
Quote:
We have a searchable database of historical teams at team_lookup, but it's on an individual team number basis. I also have team lists for each year that I use to support some statistical analysis I while away the hours with. We look at how many teams drop out each year, how many defunct veterans later return to the FIRST fold, that kind of thing. Last edited by Mark McLeod : 31-03-2009 at 19:56. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
There was only one numbered year before the numbers were locked, IIRC. I was on team 17 in 1997 and team 23 in 1998-1999 (Boston Edison was our sponsor in 98 when numbers locked, but changed to Entergy in 1999 after numbers locked. The team itself was a rookie in 1995 (National rookie all-stars that year).
The team transitioned out of FIRST after 1999, but our mentor (WFA winner) is still active in WFA judging and ran the parts table in Seattle last year. I'm curious if FIRST still does a trial competition with a few teams before kickoff. One of my college classmates did FIRST as a prototype team. They held a mini regional before kickoff to test the rules. If so, I bet they are not numbered teams. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
Yes, Team 425 receive one of these numbers because when they started they had a student on the new team that had been on another team
Mark corrected me look 2 posts down Last edited by Jeff 801 : 31-03-2009 at 21:01. Reason: Mark Corrected me look 2 posts down |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FRC Team Numbers
Yup so back before '98 we were team 8 in our rookie year due to our primary sponsor BASF. Then 11 since its alphabetical by main sponsor's name. Hence Baxter Bomb Squad being 16.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **FIRST Tech Challenge Team E-mail Blast** FTC Gets Persistent Team Numbers | Rick TYler | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 11 | 06-05-2008 14:30 |
| Unique team numbers | tagger | Chit-Chat | 6 | 21-01-2008 16:01 |
| <R14> (Team Numbers) | ChuckDickerson | Rules/Strategy | 9 | 06-03-2007 12:56 |
| Order of Team Numbers... | marlon_jbt | Chit-Chat | 39 | 29-04-2003 09:34 |
| Team Numbers | archiver | 2000 | 2 | 24-06-2002 00:24 |