|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
||||
|
||||
Ultimate Alliance
Since the Championship is over, I think it's about time for the discussions about the the ultimate alliance.
So...What teams would you put on the ultimate alliance for Lunacy? |
#2
![]() |
||||
|
||||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
im gonna say 1625, 217, and 67. game over.
|
#3
![]() |
||||
|
||||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
I would go with 67, 111, and 217
|
#4
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
considering the results of the championship, i have to say 111,67 and 121.
|
#5
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
Any three teams that can all preload in autonomous and end the game in 3 massive unloads. I suppose they could spend the rest of the time playing with empty cells/supercells if they please.
(For example 67, 217, 111, 68, 254. the list goes on) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
It looked pretty clear that 111, 67, 971 is the ultimate alliance. Three great scorers. Their methods of scoring were not all the same which helped them a lot as well. 971 was a great bot who had some bad luck in quals and lost their first five matches in Atlanta. As soon as I heard who 111 & 67 selected as their second pick I thought it was a dream alliance and knew they would be nearly impossible to beat, 971 should have been picked way before when they actually were. Good job scouting 111 & 67 and congrats to 971 on your first world championship. 111 really stepped up their game in Atlanta and were always able to get at least one dump off a match. As soon as they did it match was over.
-Keaton |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
I have to say that 111 and 67 was an ideal match up because, 111 was a huge scorer (30 plus balls) when given the oppurtunity, and their drivers typically found the best oppurtunities. 67 put up huge scores in varying amounts with amazin accuracy and very quickly. They both loaded in autonomous and started off with at least 45 balls ready to score. Assuming they missed 4 each, that's 37 balls which is about 74 points. Then 67 would have about 1 and a alf minutes to collect and dump, tyically in 2 (I say only 2 because they feild gets very scarce very quickly in elims) amounts of 7-10 balls. 111 takes a dit longer on their first dump, because their scoring mechanism was a little slower and they had to line up in an alomost pin, however, wen they did it was easily 70 points for their alliance, therefore, after theirfirst score it would be 1 minute left to pick up and score again (about 10 balls). 217 would be the best complete to the super alliance, because after their first dump of an autonomously loaded hopper (about 15-25 balls), tey could transfer all 4 empties, and then after the last one was delivered, the 20 secind mark would hit and they would have the human player pass his 2 to them (30 points in teh hopper). They would go and score them, while the other human player would have a good shot at scoring 1 of his. I would say that these three together, with the right strategy, could consistently put up 160 points, accounting for some defense and that the feild would run out of balls.
Last edited by AlexD744 : 04-19-2009 at 11:07 PM. |
#8
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
111, 217, 1625
think about how well this alliance would work together with 1625 loading from the outpost 111 from the corner and 217 from the other corner. the 2 best power dumpers in the game that showed their ability to perform together at midwest would put up high scores and 217 would turret their way to scoring a few moon rocks and some super cells. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
Quote:
|
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
111, 67, and either 217 or 1717
|
#11
![]() |
||||
|
||||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
I probably can't pick an ultimate alliance, but it would be any combination of 217, 67, 111, 1625, 1114, 2056, 1717 would be absolutely dominant.
I would say one shooter and two dumpers. So something along the lines of 217, 67, 1625/111. It's hard to leave some of these teams out though... |
#12
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
1114, 217 and 148. Hands down.
|
#13
![]() |
||||
|
||||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
gee that sounds strangely familiar...
ill have to go and say that the alliance that won the championship is the ultimate alliance. Theres a whole lot more going on between those three teams then their raw scoring power... they worked really well together. |
#14
![]() |
||||
|
||||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
How about a all Michigan alliance?
67,217,1918?? All really high scoring threats |
#15
![]() |
||||
|
||||
Re: Ultimate Alliance
1625 (Instant fill of a trailer+empty cell delivery)
217 (Consistent high scoring+Super Cell scoring) 111 (Consistent high scoring) 100% Midwest Alliance |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2008 Ultimate Alliance | Jaybee1405 | General Forum | 162 | 04-19-2008 03:30 PM |
Best Alliance in the Alliance Era of FIRST | Corey Balint | General Forum | 28 | 09-05-2006 07:14 PM |
The Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate FIRSTiny | Billfred | Chit-Chat | 4 | 04-12-2006 09:43 PM |
ULTIMATE CHALLENGE | negfrequency | Inventor | 14 | 04-12-2006 06:54 PM |
Ultimate @ Nationals | archiver | General Forum | 4 | 06-23-2002 09:29 PM |