|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Qualified teams that did not choose to attend Atlanta
While looking at the FiM final standings, I noticed that 7 of the 18 teams that qualified did not choose to attend Atlanta. At first I thought this might be because of the quick turnaround, so I looked at the Minnesota regionals. I found that for each of the Minnesota regionals, every team that qualified did attend Atlanta.
Here are the teams that qualified through FiM that did not choose to attend Atlanta: Code:
FiM Rank Team # Atlanta Nominee Rank 14 910 9 17 2620 12 18 2188 13 19 326 14 24 818 16 25 66 17 26 703 18 As part of the pilot process, has anyone (or will anyone) follow up with those teams to see why they chose not to attend Atlanta? I think that might say a lot about how the FiM model worked. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Qualified teams that did not choose to attend Atlanta
I don't think you can use the Minnesota regionals as comparison for "quick turnaround means these teams chose not to go". The qualifying teams from 10,000 Lakes were 2826, (2826), 1714, 2470, 2500, and 1986. Only 2470, 2500, and 1986 were at the time not registered for Atlanta.
Last edited by Chris is me : 04-24-2009 at 12:39 PM. Reason: sorry herobotics |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Qualified teams that did not choose to attend Atlanta
Quote:
Guess what events were on Week 6? 10,000 Lakes, North Star, and MSC. You can't use Week 5 events, because they had a little more time. Week 6 events had to say, "We're going" and actually go within a couple of days. A better comparison: Percentage of initial qualifiers that went, with "already registered" teams not included. For the MN events, that's 100%. For FiM, I'd have to crunch some numbers to give you an answer. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Qualified teams that did not choose to attend Atlanta
Team 703 had made the decision not to attend the Championship event even before this season started. Our decision was financial and political based on the situation at our main sponsor (Delphi Steering).
Matt B. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Qualified teams that did not choose to attend Atlanta
We (Team 326) were in a situtation were our team had no money at all. We had parents help pay our way to the MSC, unless we wouldn't have gone there either.
We lost our main sponser GM in September of last year and we just never had the time we want to get all the money together. Trust me if we had the money we were going. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Qualified teams that did not choose to attend Atlanta
2620 lacked the time or the money
it was sad but we had to say no |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best Teams Not In Atlanta 2009 | Billfred | Championship Event | 61 | 04-13-2009 10:12 PM |
| Teams Qualified for the Championship | astephen68 | VEX | 4 | 03-21-2009 09:08 PM |
| Favorite Teams that did not get picked | Jverdon | General Forum | 82 | 05-11-2005 09:03 PM |
| Not Pre-Qualified for Nationals? Then what's your team's plan to compete in Atlanta? | skrussel | General Forum | 30 | 01-26-2004 08:53 PM |
| Newly Qualified Teams | Todd Derbyshire | Championship Event | 1 | 04-07-2003 11:24 PM |