Go to Post Titanium is almost twice as heavy as aluminum. I can have the bragging aspect of making a bullet resistant robot, but if someone is coming into a competition and shooting my robot, I have more important things to worry about! - Andrew Blair [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 16:12
thefro526's Avatar
thefro526 thefro526 is offline
Mentor for Hire.
AKA: Dustin Benedict
no team (EWCP, MAR, FRC 708)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,599
thefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to thefro526 Send a message via MSN to thefro526
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tytus Gerrish View Post
What's the big deal? The robots only need a static part that resembles the tower bar. Seems completely straight forward to me.
Seconded. I would also suggest making it a very bright color that's easy to see from 15 feet away or so.

And just some food for thought, there are going to be a lot of teams that aren't going to be sold on hanging from your robot, I for one am completely opposed to the idea of trusting anyone enough to attempt to hang their 150lb (yes I said 150lbs, 120lb robot + 13lbs + 15lbs bumpers = ~150lbs) robot from our robot and vice versa, so you're going to have to sell whatever hanging mechanism you have to your alliance and prove that it has a safe working load of 300lbs for two robots and 450lbs for three robots.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 16:22
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,739
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

fro has a good point. If the top robot's grip fails, it will fall down onto your suspended robot.
__________________
(since 2004)
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 20:52
PAR_WIG1350's Avatar
PAR_WIG1350 PAR_WIG1350 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alan Wells
FRC #1350 (Rambots)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,188
PAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

Think more like '07, or, mount the bar so your alliance partner hangs next to you. using 2 grippers, grabbing 2 different sides of the tower, will counter any balance issues.
...@................@............................. ..............
....Y=========Y==O................................ ......
........................../........................................
........................./.........................................
......................../..........................................
......................./................O=======@..........
....................../................/I.............Y...........
.....................O==========......_____I_____. ..
......................I__ robot1___I.....I__robot2___I..
......................\_/...........\_/......\_/..........\_/..
......................(_)...........(_)......(_).. .......(_)..
O hinge/joint
@ Bar
Y grabber
(_) Wheel
.... nothing
robot 1 hangs from the tower
robot 2 hangs from robot 1

Now, robot 1's grabber is redundant to some extent, if the right, load bearing gripper fails, robot 2 will hit the ground, but robot 1 won't fall on top of it. if both of robot 1's grippers fail, they still only fall near each other, rather than directly on top of each other.
__________________
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 21:53
Nurnburger Nurnburger is offline
Registered User
FRC #0100
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 11
Nurnburger is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

One key thing about placing the bar underneath your robot is the tipping factor. If someone latches onto it, it could tip your robot sideways. Though this isn't a problem for winch systems, arms could get busted off sideways. Also, if someone's hook slides all the way over the side of the bar, it could get caught is some things that maybe it shouldn't.

I think it might make sense to put two supports on the bar in addition to the end supports. This would allow suspended robots to stay more or less in the center of your robot, and it would provide more support to that bar.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 22:10
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is online now
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,673
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

While the double robot grab idea sounds alright, I don't know how many (or if any) teams will actually add a second lifting arm to their robot for the purposes of using an attempt at a standard "handle" that has no guarantees of being itself present on any robots. Just something to consider.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2010, 17:22
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,659
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

Oh, oh, oh! I've got a standardized lifting system that I KNOW every team on the field is going to have..... wheels. Seriously. Given that most people don't read CD, and are unlikely to have a lift system that can latch at less than 60", I think wheels are your best bet for a universal lifting interface.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-01-2010, 13:11
Kims Robot's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Kims Robot Kims Robot is offline
Onto a New Chapter...
AKA: Kim O'Toole Eckhardt
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 1,467
Kims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kims Robot
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

Seeing how in 2000 & 2004 a lot of teams used some sort of hook or over the bar latching type mechanism here would be my suggestions for a standard:

1. SOMEWHERE on your robot put a bar that is the same OD as the 1.5" x.083 Wall 1020 CRS DOM Tube, and if possible use the same material.
Make the decision of WHERE to put it based on YOUR robot design. It shouldn't really matter to the other robots unless they have preprogrammed heights (in which case they or you can reprogram it for where your bar will be!) and as long as it is the right OD and strong enough to hold a 120lb robot, it will work and will be reasonably universal. If you wanted to get real fancy, put one on either side, so its easier to hang 2 robots off you.

2. Leave at LEAST 10" of free space between your mounting brackets.
This will give teams enough to "grab onto" and will account for different mechanisms. If you can leave even more room (ie put the mounting on the corners of your robot frame) its much more likely you could get 2 robots to hang off of you.

3. Make sure YOUR elevation mechanism can handle 300-450lbs hanging off of it. You may not need to LIFT this much if you get in place and let the other robots latch onto you, but you need to SUPPORT that much weight.

4. Paint it Bright Green. No vision target lights this year, so we are free to use whatever color, and that will be the most viewable from a distance. (Got this idea from a previous post )


And really, that should be enough of a standard.
__________________
~kim~
Kimberly O'Toole Eckhardt <3
Principal Systems Engineer & Program Manager
History - Team 176, Team 229, Team 1511, FIRST Volunteer!!
My new FIRST Photography Hobby & Angry Eric's Fan Page
Excellence - is the result of caring more than others think is wise, risking more than others think is safe, dreaming more than others think is practical, and expecting more than others think is possible.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-01-2010, 19:38
billfunk29 billfunk29 is offline
Registered User
FRC #3042 (Constant)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Apple Valley, MN
Posts: 8
billfunk29 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

In order to prevent the large cantilever load from a "piggy back" robot, how about the second robot drive under the first suspended robot. Assume the lifted robot can go through the tunnel and therefore could fit under. Since the bumpers are pretty well defined a simple pair of "L" brackets could provide a nest. Then the first robot climbs a little higher lifting both. Both CGs are only a few feet from the tower.
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-01-2010, 21:49
vivek16's Avatar
vivek16 vivek16 is offline
Whoa! college pilot.
AKA: vivek
FRC #2264 (trojan robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: plymouth, minnesota
Posts: 1,227
vivek16 has a reputation beyond reputevivek16 has a reputation beyond reputevivek16 has a reputation beyond reputevivek16 has a reputation beyond reputevivek16 has a reputation beyond reputevivek16 has a reputation beyond reputevivek16 has a reputation beyond reputevivek16 has a reputation beyond reputevivek16 has a reputation beyond reputevivek16 has a reputation beyond reputevivek16 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to vivek16 Send a message via MSN to vivek16
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

I am predicting that a lot of bots will use 2 hooks spaced apartsince it's more stable. You should plan accordingly with your hanger rod.
__________________
"we don't build robots, we build people"
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2010, 16:30
RRLedford RRLedford is offline
FTC 3507 Robo Theosis -- FRC 3135
AKA: Dick Ledford
FRC #3135 (Robotic Colonels)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 286
RRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond reputeRRLedford has a reputation beyond repute
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

Some thoughts:
Forget the heavy bars, and just have dangling loops of 1000 lb kevlar cable hanging from near bottom center of first elevated robot, so weight pulled there won't tilt it too much
The first robot hanging ideally should drop these cables loops to hang at one or two (low/high) agreed upon heights from its undercarriage, so that they can then easily be engaged by next bot just driving under them with a static hook mounted at the pre-agreed height. Then if 1st bot up tower still has enough remaining power to pull both itself & tow the other bots further up (at 250-400 lb force) add 3 or 6 more points. Also, if bot on floor can pull with its its hook too, even better. The key is locating these pull points as near to vertical axis of center of mass as possible to avoid excess tilting.

-RRLedford

Note: The bots hooking on may cause the elevated robot to dip below height needed to score 2.
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2010, 13:03
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is online now
Electrical/Programming Mentor
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,748
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

Quote:
Originally Posted by thefro526 View Post
Seconded. I would also suggest making it a very bright color that's easy to see from 15 feet away or so.

And just some food for thought, there are going to be a lot of teams that aren't going to be sold on hanging from your robot, I for one am completely opposed to the idea of trusting anyone enough to attempt to hang their 150lb (yes I said 150lbs, 120lb robot + 13lbs + 15lbs bumpers = ~150lbs) robot from our robot and vice versa, so you're going to have to sell whatever hanging mechanism you have to your alliance and prove that it has a safe working load of 300lbs for two robots and 450lbs for three robots.
To be safe, ALWAYS double your maximum working load. If you're lifting a 150 lb robot, you need to design it to safely lift 300 lbs. For 2 robots, 600 lbs. For 3 robots, 900 lbs.

Designing a system that can lift that much weight is going to be a pretty hard task with the materials provided. On the other hand, lifting yourself isn't nearly as hard - and with an appropriate locking mechanism in place, you can hold much more weight than your motors could ever lift. It seems that designing a system that can first touch the tower, extend to the finale configuration, grab the bar, and lift itself up would be key - then the first robot could get into position whenever they wanted (even before the 20 second finale). The other two come up and lift onto that robot in the last 20 seconds and you're golden.
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2010, 14:42
Bochek's Avatar
Bochek Bochek is offline
Registered User
AKA: Adam Bochek
FRC #2200 (MMRambotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 577
Bochek has much to be proud ofBochek has much to be proud ofBochek has much to be proud ofBochek has much to be proud ofBochek has much to be proud ofBochek has much to be proud ofBochek has much to be proud ofBochek has much to be proud ofBochek has much to be proud ofBochek has much to be proud of
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

Sorry, i haven't read the whole thread, but has anyone thought of the one part that ever team MUST have identical? Bumpers?
__________________
-----------------------------------------------
Adam Bochek - FRC 2200
http://www.mmrambotics.com
http://www.watchfirstnow.com
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2010, 15:01
The Megan 2207's Avatar
The Megan 2207 The Megan 2207 is offline
Registered User
FRC #2207 (Prime 329)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: White Bear Lake, MN
Posts: 123
The Megan 2207 is just really niceThe Megan 2207 is just really niceThe Megan 2207 is just really niceThe Megan 2207 is just really nice
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bochek View Post
Sorry, i haven't read the whole thread, but has anyone thought of the one part that ever team MUST have identical? Bumpers?
I wouldn't trust bumpers to hold a robot. It's not a good idea to carry your robot by the bumpers, so it certainly wouldn't be a good idea to suspend another robot from your bumpers. (Yes, this idea has been discussed earlier in the thread.)
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2010, 01:28
HazzardFuzzBomb's Avatar
HazzardFuzzBomb HazzardFuzzBomb is offline
Why is that smoking?
AKA: Dakota
FRC #1780 (Wolves Robotics)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 6
HazzardFuzzBomb is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

But with a strong recommendation to not lift (as in just picking up the robot by hand) by the bumpers, how would you plan to support a 150lb robot by your bumper?
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 15:54
frank.pendzich's Avatar
frank.pendzich frank.pendzich is offline
Mr.P
AKA: Mr. P
FRC #3011 (RoboWarriors)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Posts: 20
frank.pendzich is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: MERGED: Universal Hanging System/Standardized Partner Suspension

We're considering a strategy where we don't hang from the horizontal rails at the top of the tower, but the verticle supports. Are the towers secured so they can support a robot hanging off the side of the tower?
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
**FIRST EMAIL**/FSM & Partner Control System/Driver's Station & Beta Testing Call Mark McLeod FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive 0 13-11-2009 14:01
First Week Regionals *Merged* Tom Bottiglieri Regional Competitions 34 11-03-2005 18:42
Standardized Scouting System/File Format phrontist General Forum 15 18-04-2004 17:05
Favorite Part of FIRST <-Merged with old thread dk5sm5luigi General Forum 36 25-01-2004 12:11


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:06.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi