|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
Yes, go for it, but before you get too far along, you might want to make sure it will not cause damage to the TOWER.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
The pipe should kink before the tower tips over. A word of warning though. You kink the tower pipe, consider how long it will take to disassemble the field and find a replacement pipe (it's likely there will not be a spare shipped with the field, meaning shop time) and reassemble the field. Then consider how many teams are waiting, and that they know you are why they can't play.
Do math. Wetzel |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
I'm sure anyone designing this type of hanging would wanna have a wide grip anyways... and the wider the grip on the bar, the less likely the bar would bend or break.
Our team has talked about this hanging method and started design a system with a 28" wide grip. Far more then what was calculate by Kevin EDIT: our system is similar to the boy on the bar, but uses mechanical leverage and should be much much safer then a "hook and lift" method |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
its going to be difficult hanging sideways since rules state the robot has to be hanging 12 inches off the ground and side ways would require more lift
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
Quote:
Wetzel |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
To re-iterate my point of having a 250lb + cg that's as much as 4-6' away from the SIDE of the tower. If you have a 130lb bot 4' tall but in horizontal position (Meaning your base has over 120 lbs in it and its suspended 4' from the side of the tower) Then another bot hooks on to your base adding another 130lbs and also shifting the cg even further from the tower (then possibly even a 3rd bot hooks on), I can almost guarantee the tower will fall over and it could bend the pipe depending on design and how the bots climb on (bouncy etc.) I doubt the tower structure weighs more than 50lbs and only has an 18" plate sticking out? But 250-370lbs of bots hanging 4+ feet away will topple it. I'll be surprised if they don't nix the idea. Maybe I'm wrong.. we'll see...
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
The Q&A is now up. Can anyone ask about this? I cannot because I do not have access to my teams "official" login.
EDIT: One thing that I forgot to mention, its would be much harder to topple the top if you hanging sideways at a low elevation (just about the platform say) also, the platform would supply an increased resistance to bending and breaking the bar. I think this is totally doable Last edited by T3_1565 : 13-01-2010 at 13:39. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
Quote:
Wetzel |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
"Is the tower strong enough to support the weight of three robots hanging from a vertical bar as oppose to the standard horizontal bar?"
and asking them if your allowed to hang off the vertical bar is a completely good question to me. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
Quote:
Quote:
Don't confuse the tunnel height with the platform level.Quote:
More to the point, I'm seriously doubting that you can flip the tower before you fail the vertical pipes. Flipping the tower is going to require applying that huge moment to the tower somewhere. Which is going to be transmitted through the vertical pipes. Which are going to break if you put that kind of moment on them. Plus, there's the ball return which is going to resist your efforts at flipping the tower. So... I think worries about flipping the tower are a bit less immediate than worries about breaking it. |
|
#12
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
Quote:
Let's say the teams hanging all went through reasonable measures in preventing their robots from creating excessive forces and causing damages while hanging. In the event of a tower failure, is it FIRST's responsibility to make the tower stronger, or is it team's responsibilities to change their design such that failure will not occur again (like redesigning to hang from the horizontal bars)? Interesting thing to think about. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
I think a team that is going to do this is not so much thinking about holding other bots,but that they can hang from their home zone and open up more space for other teams. If this team can climb in 10 seconds they would be able to score up to that point, then head over to the pole. Now does the other team leave a defender back or does he leave early to hang. Oh, so many variables this year.
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
I'd agree that if the rules don't prohibit it, it is allowed, but I'd hate to spend a lot of time designing, building and perfecting it, just to have it thrown out by a rules clarification in week 5 of build.
It wouldn't surprise me to see that happen, especially if there was concern about damage to the field. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sideways Hanging - Yes or No
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sideways Driving | zzz | Rules/Strategy | 8 | 08-01-2008 01:37 |
| Mounting the ES17-12 sideways orientation | SuperBK | Electrical | 10 | 21-01-2007 09:38 |
| Sideways vs Forward Speed of Mercanum | ggoldman | Technical Discussion | 1 | 20-01-2007 11:06 |
| Can the Cameras be mounted Sideways? | vicecityman666 | Technical Discussion | 1 | 29-01-2005 10:21 |
| Sideways mounting | srjjs | Electrical | 13 | 25-01-2003 20:31 |